Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by dogruck on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @04:59AM
(#15540191)
I'm surprised that this isn't old news for every HN reader. Did something change that I'm overlooking?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by Confiks on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @06:32AM
(#15540592)
It's not so rare for older but well-written articles to show up multiple times on the HN frontpage.
It's somewhat rarer for a 'product' such as Sci-hub to show up multiple times, but considering that the HN crowd is pretty proud about Sci-hub's existence and will readily strike up a conversation about the Evil Publisher Empire, it's not so strange to see it on top.
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by mino on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @05:23AM
(#15540303)
Indeed. How can scihub be on #1 on the HN homepage?
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by wallflower on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @05:30AM
(#15540341)
I think it is evidence that there a lot more new HN users than old HN users now. I'm not saying this is good or bad, just an observation.
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by dogruck on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @05:48AM
(#15540422)
Interesting. Any way to get data on active new user numbers over time?
Regardless, Sci-Hub launched in 2011 and has been frequently discussed in the media since then.
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by stevemclaugh on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @03:08PM
(#15544330)
The only data we have are the 2015-16 download logs posted by Elbakyan and a reporter for 'Science.' At the time they had 28 million+ downloads over 6 months. I truly hope no more logs are released (at least not with that level of detail).
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by FabHK on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @06:53AM
(#15540659)
Pertinent xkcd ("Ten Thousand", first time)
Re:Sci-Hub: Public access to research papers
by dogruck on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @07:09AM
(#15540714)
Ah, yes, a classic (so tempted to say, "wow never saw that before today!").
Do you think the same calculation is applicable to the HN user base? Seems like the relevant inputs are:
* New active users per month (instead of 4M born per year)
* Frequency that a link hits the HN top, assuming a high percentage of active HN users will subsequently forever know about the link
* Total number of times the link hit the top as a proxy for longevity of popularity