News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by frogpelt on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:20PM (#15519185)
How was the case handled? Did they find the gunman? Was he charged?

I ask because, honestly, I don't think I care what they police say when they first walk up as long as they solve the crime, catch the perpetrator.

The problem we have nowadays is that we get to see "how the (justice system) sausage is made" a lot more than we used to. And it's disturbing. But those guys out there with uniforms on are the ones trying to survive every day and bring criminals to justice. It's easy to be an armchair quarterback.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by Zak on Friday October 20, 2017 @06:47PM (#15519620)
> It's easy to be an armchair quarterback.

I don't know how to be an orthopedic surgeon. The closest thing I've had to medical training was a first aid and CPR class. What I do know is that if an orthopedic surgeon, upon first seeing an overweight patient complaining of hip pain says "lay off the cheeseburgers and your hip will be fine, you fat slob", that doctor is doing a bad job. Not only is it hostile and rude, it fails to attempt to adequately understand the situation before rushing to judgement.

I do know a little about how to be a police officer. I went to school for it, but decided that wasn't what I want to do with my life. Accusing a complainant of lying right off the bat without any investigation when the complaint is anything more believable than an alien abduction, then having the evidence of your rudeness deleted is not how to be a good cop. I don't think it really takes much training or experience to reach that conclusion.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by goialoq on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:43PM (#15519857)
> I went to school for it, but decided that wasn't what I want to do with my life.

Interesting, because most police officers don't need to go to school for it to get the job, right?

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by dragonwriter on Friday October 20, 2017 @08:22PM (#15519970)
> Interesting, because most police officers don't need to go to school for it to get the job, right?

It's usually not a minimum requirement, but a degree, usually in criminal justice, can be a significant competitive advantage in applications.

You don't strictly need to go to school to be a professional programmer, either, but people still go to school for it.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by katastic on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:38PM (#15519833)
> It's easy to be an armchair quarterback.

If my arm was made out of a chair, I'd think I'd have difficulty throwing the ball to a wide receiver.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by rhizome on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:39PM (#15519298)
But those guys out there with uniforms on are the ones trying to survive every day

Yeah, no. It's not that dangerous.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by Clubber on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:45PM (#15519322)
Not even in the top ten. Less dangerous than grounds maintenance worker.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/01/28/chart...

As far as straight up getting murdered, it's in the top 2, but #1 taxi drivers are murdered at almost 3x the rate.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by emmelaich on Friday October 20, 2017 @10:46PM (#15520413)
Statistics are deceiving. No one has it in for grounds maintenance workers and taxi drivers and they typically don't go looking for trouble.

For policeman it's their job to go to dangerous places.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by Clubber on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:43PM (#15520541)
>Statistics are deceiving.

Yes, in this example, I would imagine non-government job injuries are probably under reported.

>No one has it in for ... taxi drivers

Apparently they do. They get murdered almost 3x as often per capita as police officers. Maybe it's their money they're after.

>For policeman it's their job to go to dangerous places.

The same can be said for taxi drivers, delivery drivers, postal service, electric linemen, crab fishermen, loggers, proctologists ...

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by danenania on Friday October 20, 2017 @11:39PM (#15520532)
What about these particular statistics is deceiving? You can't just dismiss hard data without explanation. Why would your subjective impression of danger be more accurate than these numbers?
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by zo1 on Saturday October 21, 2017 @07:30AM (#15521516)
I would say it's misleading because it makes people think it's "not that dangerous" to be a policeman. While at the same time not presenting the obvious existence of things that "downplay" that statistic. I.e. That policemen are more often than not armed and able to protect themselves. We at least need to have additional data to make any conclusions about it. Not just the plain "deaths per profession" statistic.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by Clubber on Saturday October 21, 2017 @02:41PM (#15522957)
If you look at the article I linked, the main statistic is injuries per profession. The actual deaths per profession has police as #2. Injuries per profession, the police is not even in the top 10. It depends on how you define dangerous.

It boils down to, I guess police is a dangerous profession, but certainly not in the extreme as shown by the existence of more dangerous professions. Also, being dangerous profession certainly doesn't excuse other types of workers to blatantly use deadly force because they are scared of their profession, and it shouldn't be an excuse for police to do the same. Yet, here we are, in a thread talking about police misconduct, and someone comes up with "but their jobs are dangerous," as if it should stand as an excuse for misconduct. It does not.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by Zigurd on Saturday October 21, 2017 @04:50PM (#15523558)
Cuts both ways: Considering how non-US police operate, often without being armed, and trained to deescalate tense situations, and the outcomes they produce, it seems as likely if not more likely that disarming many US police would result is fewer dead cops and fewer dead people in general.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by EliRivers on Friday October 20, 2017 @06:28PM (#15519528)
It's easy to be an armchair quarterback.

I hear this every time someone with a difficult job has it pointed out to them that they're doing it badly. They don't even pretend that somehow makes it acceptable to do the job badly; I honestly don't know what effect saying it is supposed to have.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by captncraig on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:04PM (#15519700)
It's an ad hominem attempt to deflect attention back at the attacker. Being wrong is hard to deal with, so you change the subject. It is a fairly subconscious reaction.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by kbutler on Friday October 20, 2017 @08:18PM (#15519958)
It's a recognition that there are complications beyond the simplistic picture one can get without personal experience. This often includes time, budget, and policy constraints the individual has no control over.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by CyberDildonics on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:13PM (#15520137)
Except that there are many examples of police that do their jobs very well. I'm not sure why it has to be a mystery what standard police should be held to.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:24PM (#15520177)
If airline pilots crashed half of their flights we would be right to criticize them. Having a hard job is no excuse for doing it poorly.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by kbutler on Saturday October 21, 2017 @12:37AM (#15520677)
And if police catastrophically fail half their interactions, we should criticize them, too.

We only end up discussing the tiny fraction of police cases where things go badly.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Saturday October 21, 2017 @05:26AM (#15521272)
What percentage of airline crashes is acceptable? What percentage of police abuses of power is acceptable? Half was a made up number. The point is we are right to hold the police to a high standard and demand solutions when they fail in their duties.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by kbutler on Saturday October 21, 2017 @10:19AM (#15521914)
Yes. And when an airline crash occurs, we don't just say, "it's because the pilot is a horrible person", or worse, "all pilots are horrible people." We analyze what went wrong and what we can do better, then we engineer the system to accommodate human weakness and prevent damage from human error.

It's easy to be an armchair pilot, but usually crashes are caused by more complex issues.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Saturday October 21, 2017 @11:15PM (#15524991)
Yes airplane crashes are complex, that's painfully obvious. In the case of an airline crash we don't say "well flying is complicated this is bound to happen" or otherwise make excuses for the pilot.

If we were as diligent with our police forces as we are with commercial airlines we wouldn't have as many bad cops.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by s73ver_ on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:38PM (#15519289)
I feel being shocked at how this person was treated is not just "armchair quarterbacking". Given the power and trust we place in police, I don't feel it's unreasonable to expect they treat people with respect.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by gozur88 on Friday October 20, 2017 @06:31PM (#15519546)
... and that they're punished pretty severely when they betray that trust.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by syshum on Friday October 20, 2017 @10:47PM (#15520417)
They are? I have been following police abuse for nearly 15 years... I do not see any evidence of that
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by andrewaylett on Saturday October 21, 2017 @06:30AM (#15521383)
I think -- but am not certain, not being the GP -- that's their point: they don't see it happening, but think that a reasonable person would expect it.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by gozur88 on Saturday October 21, 2017 @02:50PM (#15523006)
You are correct. I meant the ellipses to indicate a continuation of the sentence, and if you put it together you get this:

"Given the power and trust we place in police, I don't feel it's unreasonable to expect they treat people with respect and that they're punished pretty severely when they betray that trust."

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by icebraining on Saturday October 21, 2017 @06:07AM (#15521346)
I think gozur88 is following on the previous statement "I don't feel it's unreasonable to expect..."
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:31PM (#15520195)
Sometimes.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by will_brown on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:00PM (#15519676)
Here is what happened...

The next morning I get a call from the detective in the county to the South confirming he obtained video from the gas station where this all originated (the defendant approaching me while I’m pumping gas).

Next I get a notification from Apple my iPad has been found, which I placed in lost/stolen mode. I call the detective who doesn’t answer his phone and then the police station in the county where I escaped and my iPad was located. Dispatch informed me they would not go to the address provided by Apple to look for the defendant, my car or iPad until I drove back up to that county and met with the police.

I drove back to the county and met with two police officers who drove to the address (only 1.5 miles from the police station) but they did not see my vehicle, and apparently there was no way they would get a warrant to search the domicile for my iPad and they wouldn’t bother knocking to see if the suspect was there.

Unconvinced I worked up the nerve to drive by the property myself...I’ll be damned if I didn’t see my car driving up and down the streets of this neighborhood. I did my best to tail the car until it parked 1 house away from the address provided by Apple, and watched as the defendant got out of my car walked into the the street as I drove past. Once again I called 911 and plead they come back out to the address while I waited a few blocks away.

Once I saw a police car enter the neighborhood I followed until we arrived at my car which had already been relocated about a block away from where I saw it park and I drove past the defendant. On scene an officer was questioning 2 individuals on the front porch of the house where my car was parked and the defendant was standing on the sidewalk about 5 feet from my car. I basically yelled officer that’s the man who kidnapped me with a gun and car jacked me. He was handcuffed and taken into custody.

Shortly after I was asked to appear at the police station where I ended up being questioned and accused of trying to buy “the hard stuff”...I had to ask, apparently that’s crack. And this was the same detective who already obtained video of the gas station corroborating my entire story, I explained I was an attorney that I had just run 18 miles on the morning I was kidnapped (showed my run keeper app and everything) and otherwise I wasn’t celebrating my 18 mile run with crack. Almost immediately I was told I can go, of course I asked if he would get a warrant to recover my iPad and more important look for the gun, and I was told “no, those kinds of resources don’t exist.”

The defendant was arrested on Sunday, charged with grand theft of an auto and bonded out on Monday. Not until the “State Attorney Hearing” a few weeks later where the State attoney confirmed she had 2 prior cases against this guy where with similar facts: he stole a car in the county to the South and the cars were recovered in the county to the North, did I finally feel vindicated. Then, 1 week later his bond was revoked and the real charges came including assault with a deadly weapon and kidnapping with a fire arm.

As to it being easy to be a armchair quarterback, I wouldn’t know but I’ll take your word for it.

Edit: deleted link to the public record of the case

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by rconti on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:52PM (#15519885)
Damn, that's terrible. I don't even get the police's implication here-- If you're trying to buy illegal drugs, you DESERVE to be carjacked, and furthermore they shouldn't try to press charges on the carjacker until it's proven that they weren't trying to sell you illegal drugs? The mind boggles.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by syshum on Friday October 20, 2017 @10:44PM (#15520405)
>> I don't even get the police's implication here-- If you're trying to buy illegal drugs, you DESERVE to be carjacked,

I dont know about "deserved" but if they can make it a drug case then they can keep the car, the ipad, and probably steal err "seize" more property from the victim under civil asset forfeiture

Further they can use that statistic to point to an increase in "drug activity" in the county opening up the dept for grants from the DEA and other federal programs under the failed War on Drugs

A simple car jacking they get no money for. Violent crime they get no money for

Drugs is where the money is

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by rconti on Friday October 20, 2017 @10:51PM (#15520424)
sigh I wish you weren't right, but that's a good point.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by katastic on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:41PM (#15519847)
Sounds like you should move if your PD department is that terrible.

And I'm being serious. If it's that big of a problem for you, and you're getting robbed at gunpoint, GET THE CRAP OUT OF THERE.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by empath75 on Saturday October 21, 2017 @07:47AM (#15521558)
Every police department is that terrible.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by katastic on Saturday October 21, 2017 @12:27PM (#15522361)
Mine is not. So it's sad that you feel that way.

Mine just sent a guy on ten day suspension WITHOUT PAY for getting mad at his kids football game and throwing a helmet. He was off-duty and still reflected poorly on the profession and his department so BAM, 10 days without pay.

It even made the news because so many people care about it.

Contrast that with whatever cesspool you're stuck living in, and once again, I suggest: You should probably move. Unless you're just exagerating and you're not actually in fear of injustice. But if your story is true, you should be.

Because if you think every police department is like that, then you're either listening to non-stop propaganda, or, surrounded by actual shit police departments.

And before you think I'm some automatic "cop defender", when I lived just 100 miles away for college, I was surrounded by shit cops, some of which who went to prison for being shit cops, and one even lied on a police report that I tried to file when I was robbed.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by CyberDildonics on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:17PM (#15520150)
How does this compare to the police force that you've dealt with in your work? It seems like these guys can't warm a seat with their asses on fire.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by Danihan on Friday October 20, 2017 @07:11PM (#15519726)
Link doesn't work, great story though. Hope the guy gets 10 years plus. We should have very little tolerance, as a society, for these sorts of violent crimes.