News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:24PM (#15520177)
If airline pilots crashed half of their flights we would be right to criticize them. Having a hard job is no excuse for doing it poorly.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by kbutler on Saturday October 21, 2017 @12:37AM (#15520677)
And if police catastrophically fail half their interactions, we should criticize them, too.

We only end up discussing the tiny fraction of police cases where things go badly.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Saturday October 21, 2017 @05:26AM (#15521272)
What percentage of airline crashes is acceptable? What percentage of police abuses of power is acceptable? Half was a made up number. The point is we are right to hold the police to a high standard and demand solutions when they fail in their duties.
Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by kbutler on Saturday October 21, 2017 @10:19AM (#15521914)
Yes. And when an airline crash occurs, we don't just say, "it's because the pilot is a horrible person", or worse, "all pilots are horrible people." We analyze what went wrong and what we can do better, then we engineer the system to accommodate human weakness and prevent damage from human error.

It's easy to be an armchair pilot, but usually crashes are caused by more complex issues.

Re:A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations by mulmen on Saturday October 21, 2017 @11:15PM (#15524991)
Yes airplane crashes are complex, that's painfully obvious. In the case of an airline crash we don't say "well flying is complicated this is bound to happen" or otherwise make excuses for the pilot.

If we were as diligent with our police forces as we are with commercial airlines we wouldn't have as many bad cops.