The actual story is that the oversight body wasn't informed that BPDs were being shared with foreign governments, law enforcement and industry partners. There is no oversight of the process. Partners don't have to meet any standards on use of the data. There are no penalties for misuse of the data. This makes it possible to circumvent UK regulations. These are the privacy issues.
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/12/isc-report-privacy-and-sec...
Is it? I was under the impression that I was sharing information with my "friends".
Or to not give you social aid since you aren't the right type of profile.
The European custom of attaching a photo to your cv is more dangerous and the eu should have outlawed that rather than say the silly cookie law
What European countries would those be? The only country I even know of that tracks 'race' in census data is the US.
[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melderegister#Inhalt
I gather you're from a country without a resident register?
EDIT: Also you shouldn't mix up the content of a resident register with the information you find on a public ID card. The information printed on those is a lot more limited.
While I definitely heed this advice, it seems a bit like saying, if you don't wan't to be robbed or murdered, don't go outside your house!
Social media is public. It's intentionally public. That's really the whole point. It's your choice to post things to Facebook or Twitter or Snapstergram.
Of all the privacy issues that we should be worried about it feels like this should not be one of them. If you don't want your social media info used... don't post it to social media!