News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wag, the ‘Uber for Dog-Walking,’ Is Drawing Uber-Like Scr... by LeifCarrotson on Monday October 16, 2017 @03:22PM (#15485935)
Rover.com is doing pretty well [1] with a similar service. In my area at least, these dog sitters (and, I assume, these dog walkers) are young, and take it on temporarily as an alternate source of income. They may not stick around for long, and you'll soon be looking for another. Also, their schedules may change frequently - your preferred walker/sitter may not be available on the date of your vacation or other cause for needing the service. And for the price, both the sitter and the walker may find keeping track of billing and payment through the app to be simpler.

[1]: https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2016/10/r...

Re:Wag, the ‘Uber for Dog-Walking,’ Is Drawing Uber-Like Scr... by fossuser on Monday October 16, 2017 @04:27PM (#15486390)
My sister does rover and it suffers from the same issue the parent comment talks about (which is also the reason homejoy probably failed).

As soon as she builds a relationship with the person they transact outside the app.

Re:Wag, the ‘Uber for Dog-Walking,’ Is Drawing Uber-Like Scr... by subpixel on Monday October 16, 2017 @10:42PM (#15488263)
Also: Rover offers insurance. This probably has an effect on customer retention.