Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by danmaz74 on Friday October 13, 2017 @06:13AM
(#15464367)
Tunnels are very, very expensive.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by zimpenfish on Friday October 13, 2017 @06:24AM
(#15464403)
e.g. https://pedestrianobservations.com/2016/12/15/second-avenue-...
> The total length of the project, from 96th Street and 2nd Avenue to 125th Street and Lexington, is about 2.7 km. At $2.2 billion per km, this sets a new world record for subway construction costs, breaking that of the first phase of the same line, which only cost $1.7 billion per km.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by Pxtl on Friday October 13, 2017 @08:34PM
(#15470046)
I read one article that blamed the high cost of modern subways primarily on the hyper-elaborate modern subway stations and the actual tunnels are a small component of the cost.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by zimpenfish on Monday October 16, 2017 @04:50AM
(#15481762)
I think you're right - tunnels seem to be about $200-400M per km when considered purely on their own.
Re:Hyperloop One Becomes ‘Virgin Hyperloop One’
by pstuart on Monday October 16, 2017 @03:14PM
(#15485852)
Musk seems to think he can do it faster/cheaper. His track record makes it worth considering.
The article I linked to smacks his arrogance down over costs that he's overlooking, but even that may be addressable. Let's see what he delivers in the next 5 years.
https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-test-tunnel/