News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by mrfusion on Sunday October 08, 2017 @11:23AM (#15428535)
What breakthroughs would be required to make this feasible for something the size of a flip phone?
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by m1el on Sunday October 08, 2017 @11:29AM (#15428561)
Not doable. A neutrino detector, including radiation shielding, cannot be the size of a flip phone.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by joko145 on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:21PM (#15428776)
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by m1el on Monday October 09, 2017 @07:09AM (#15432864)
No, that wouldn't help.

Please look at the picture: you can see a neutrino detector being held. But what's also very important to detect neutrinos is shielding from every other type of radiation, so that you can differentiate between neutrino radiation and everything else. The shielding is done by metallic (likely, lead) bars around the detector. The shielding is much more massive than the detector.

Another point: in the article they say that they have detected a 136 neutrino events over 461 days. So you can transfer one bit ~10 days. Neutrino detector sensitivity scales linearly with volume. Now imagine if you scale down your ~5-10 liter detector to a volume of 0.2 liters (a fliphone volume).

Which is to say, not doable.

Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by mrfusion on Sunday October 08, 2017 @11:34AM (#15428575)
I’m thinking we’d need new physics discoveries. Maybe elements from the island of stability might help. Or something with superconductors. You never know.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by pvg on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:13PM (#15428740)
Given that these things are neutral and effortlessly fly out of collapsing supernova cores, heavier elements and superconductors are not very likely to help.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by netheril96 on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:54PM (#15428930)
By our current understanding, superconductors only exist under extreme cold, a condition never occurring naturally in stars and supernovas. So the fact that neutrinos fly out effortlessly does not preclude the possibility of a superconducting trap of neutrinos.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by scentoni on Sunday October 08, 2017 @01:07PM (#15428981)
There is nothing about a superconductor that would trap a neutrino.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by adrianN on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:13PM (#15428738)
If new physics are allowed then it's simple. We just need a Neutrino detector that fits in a phone and doesn't need too much electricity.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by kobeya on Sunday October 08, 2017 @01:02PM (#15428964)
That would require a phone made out of something other than matter.
Re:Demonstration of Communication using Neutrinos (2012) by Rzor on Sunday October 08, 2017 @08:05PM (#15430709)
What if the phones connect to the neutrino detector central server? The only latency would be getting to the server...