Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by maw on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @06:21PM
(#15396695)
Lots of programmers haven't, though.
I get addresses rejected as invalid when signing up for some service at least once a month.
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by baddox on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @11:30PM
(#15398093)
My favorite is one site I encountered that let you create and login with such an email address, but the forgot password form couldn’t handle it and would 500.
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by deathanatos on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @08:16PM
(#15397359)
I've seen programmers get overruled by "product managers" in regards to handling email as it is intended to be handled.
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by dx034 on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @04:45AM
(#15399080)
A lot of services don't allow + in email addresses. With gmail you can also insert a . anywhere you like which works more often. But sometimes, catch all addresses really help to test.
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by igravious on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @05:26AM
(#15399220)
What standard is [email protected] a part of?
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by zimpenfish on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @05:46AM
(#15399275)
I don't think there's a standard which says that "X+Y delivers to X" - it's a configurable option in exim and you could equally well make it "XqY delivers to X" if you were wilfully perverse.
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by reacweb on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @06:50AM
(#15399522)
It was already a known trick to identify sources of spam when I was student (1990-1993).
Re:Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3B
by BoorishBears on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @06:00PM
(#15396594)
And spam filters
I’m sure spammers have already figured that out.