Re:Diminishing returns of static typing
by snambi on Monday October 02, 2017 @12:52PM
(#15385492)
Any program that is non-trivial meaning 100K+ lines of code, involves many developers over 2+ years of time, should be written in a statically typed language.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Diminishing returns of static typing
by hellofunk on Monday October 02, 2017 @02:34PM
(#15386516)
That really means nothing. 100K+ lines of code is an arbitrary number. For that many lines of C++, a similar Clojure solution to the same problem would be a small fraction of that. And many widely-used Clojure libraries are in production all over the industry for many years.
Re:Diminishing returns of static typing
by 201709User on Monday October 02, 2017 @01:38PM
(#15385975)
That requires some sort of prophecy abilities. Why not play it (type-) safe?