201709User

"Better than many, not as good as some".

The Apex Fallacy cognitive bias is missing.

HP did a cheap tablet give away :P.

At least they did it with a tweet. It's a sign of respect, right?

I have no other way to describe weak typing and scoping rules of the said language. I stand by my words.

JavaScript: Mistake-oriented paradigm.

Bob makes money selling TDD to chumps.

You can absolutely force them. But you shouldn't.

I will use baby boomer approach - benefit today, screw the future.

It's not even a real Visual Studio, not to mention it's mostly used for writing scripts rather than code. So color can be any at this point.

No tiles in launcher? Garbage.

Edge means offloading cloud computation to thick clients.

It's better to have 50 keywords than 1000 nested brackets.

We are trying to list features, not defects.

If it's a stench it's just Java.

Also outsourcing cheaply.

Then machine learning it is.

Minus pension, minus insurance, plus accounting expense. So deduct a few grand.

Also permanent guys get to support contractors' code, which adds an insult to an injury.

That requires some sort of prophecy abilities. Why not play it (type-) safe?

Yes, why do something automatically when you can do manual work!

If I don't have to maintain the thing you can give me any Python, JS or Go you want!

Do they get their hands dirty?

Sunken emotional cost fallacy - there gotta be some value in PhD even if it's a sense of superiority.

What if she falsely says she was raped - how is the customer protected? Having a sympathetic middlemen helps.

Well, recruiters and bodyshops are currently decriminalized - how bad are pimps in comparison really.

No, it's a slut who is shaming. A nuanced but crucial distinction.

The company has a choice of not employing you though and it tells you exactly what work to do. Now if you force the company to pay, then yes your example confirms my statement.

And then sell them to any country willing to buy. The bring-your-own-warhead approach.

If you take money from individual A put it into a common pot and then give it to individual B then individual B is effectively getting individual A's money.