Now why would a major financial entity want you to think external decentralized technologies are scams, and their in-house solution is fine and legitimate and secure.
"The research to date leads to the following conclusions: A blockchain title recording system is the future of title record keeping and would provide immediate benefits over the current title recording system, with additional benefits accruing in the future as blockchain technology grows in acceptance. However, at the moment, these benefits do not yet outweigh the costs and challenges associated with implementing a prototype blockchain title registry system in Davidson County, or elsewhere in the country. That being said, steps can, and should be taken now to lay the foundation for a blockchain system."
dci.mit.edu/assets/papers/spielman_thesis.pdfdci.mit.edu/assets/papers/spielman_thesis.pdf
Avi Spielman, in "Blockchain: Digitally Rebuilding the Real Estate Industry" does a terrific job addressing and exploring "aspect(s)- recording property titles- by comparing the benefits and limitations of a blockchain with those of the current record keeping system."
dci.mit.edu/assets/papers/spielman_thesis.pdfdci.mit.edu/assets/papers/spielman_thesis.pdf
Maersk is using it for something as boring as secure claims for containers to fight corruption in shipping.
In government we're looking into running things like the land ownership registry and other public records on the tech. Not because it's hip, but because it'll save employee resources when we have to perform less audits, and because it'll speed response times.