Re:Stop Calling it ‘Identity Theft’
by astura on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @10:47AM
(#15348288)
When I was a teenager in the 90s I worked at a chain store that had the policy of asking customers for their zip code at checkout to collect data on who was shopping. People sometimes would get really mad (and I mean really mad) that I was asking them, and since it was before the internet went mainstream people had not been conditioned to give out personal information yet/were unfamiliar with big data/weren't getting anything in return for their zip code. So in order to confuse the system (and avoid upsetting anyone - I am conflict avoidant) I would solely use 90210 as the zip code of all our shoppers, despite being on the other side of the country from Beverly Hills. I conspired to get my coworkers to do the same. A quarter of a century later I still feel minor gratification that I stuck it to the man.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stop Calling it ‘Identity Theft’
by marssaxman on Thursday September 28, 2017 @08:09PM
(#15361807)
When a store offers the option of entering a phone number instead of using a physical "loyalty card", I've found that XXX-867-5309 nearly always works, where XXX is your local area code (for me, it's 206).
Re:Stop Calling it ‘Identity Theft’
by SAI_Peregrinus on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @07:13PM
(#15353215)
I'm partial to giving my address as 1060 West Addison St., Chicago, IL 60613.
That Wrigley Field, for those not from Chicago.