Re:Upterm – A terminal emulator and interactive shell based ...
by etatoby on Thursday September 21, 2017 @10:09AM
(#15303541)
> Performance is definitely worse than in iTerm or gnome-terminal
Considering I dropped those because I consider them slow and bloated, good luck with this Electron monstrosity.
You can have my RXVT when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Re:Upterm – A terminal emulator and interactive shell based ...
by creshal on Thursday September 21, 2017 @08:59AM
(#15302855)
> Performance is definitely worse than in iTerm or gnome-terminal
I dropped those because they're magnitudes slower than urxvt. You managed to make a terminal emulator that's even worse?
Re:Upterm – A terminal emulator and interactive shell based ...
by phren0logy on Thursday September 21, 2017 @09:04AM
(#15302898)
Hey, I bet nobody will force you to use it or help develop it.
Not every tool fits everyone’s needs. Some tools might only be useful to a few people.
No need to be rude about it.
Re:Upterm – A terminal emulator and interactive shell based ...
by Diti on Thursday September 21, 2017 @09:04AM
(#15302901)
I don’t mean to spark a controversy, but that’s what happens when you use Electron.
Re:Upterm – A terminal emulator and interactive shell based ...
by trapperkeeper74 on Thursday September 21, 2017 @09:41AM
(#15303244)
LOL. I dropped Atom back to Vim the same reason.. electron apps are just too slow and memory-hogging compared to native apps.
Recently there was this terminal performance test https://danluu.com/term-latency/
The author says that the most important things are typing delay and how quickly you can Ctrl+C a command, not how much text it prints per second. Upterm is good at both.