Re:DuckDuckGo vs Google
by newbear on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @07:37AM
(#15292593)
Did you consider protonmail? If so, why fastmail?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
This discussion last month includes many anecdotes regarding various email providers:
I can only speak for my own decision-making process, but I like to pay for my email so that I have greater confidence that the provider will still be in business 10 years from now, and more confidence that my data is my own.
Really like Fastmail.
How does paying ensure the data is your own?
Paying means that the provider doesn't have to mine your email for keywords in order to display targeted ads (yeah, I know Google theoretically stopped doing this recently). So perhaps "your own" in the sense that another entity isn't accessing it.
Re:DuckDuckGo vs Google
by eh78ssxv2f on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @08:09PM
(#15299502)
> So perhaps "your own" in the sense that another entity isn't accessing it.
Do they have a spam filter? If yes, how do they filter emails without accessing it?
Re:DuckDuckGo vs Google
by admiralpumpkin on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @12:03PM
(#15295268)
You're the customer, not their product.
But the data is still not in your control. Right?
Re:DuckDuckGo vs Google
by SAI_Peregrinus on Wednesday September 20, 2017 @11:11AM
(#15294598)
Protonmail has paid plans.