News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Shows the Truth: It Is Probably Worth... by Synaesthesia on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @04:27AM (#15282718)
Fractional reserve is how most countries banks operate.

Yes they just “print money” actually they create it electronically, that’s how the government got the money for quantitative easing.

The reserve bank has control over the money supply. They can create more or less, and thereby regulate the inflation rate of a country.

Re:Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Shows the Truth: It Is Probably Worth... by alexasmyths on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @04:38AM (#15282773)
You're misrepresenting money creation. It's not arbitrary.

The government is trading money they create, for some type of asset - in the case of QE, it could be government bonds, or other things. i.e. taking bonds 'off the market' and putting currency 'on the market'. Some day it will will reverse.

Ergo - that currency is 'backed by' an asset, i.e. government bonds, or other securities.

Obviously they have to 'create it' somehow in order for it to exist, but it's only created in exchange for assets, which are held by the central bank.

'Money printing' or 'arbitrary money creation' is when governments/central banks create money out of thin air for whatever purpose.

When a government 'prints money' to pay of debt to some other country - that's just 'printing money out of thin air' - the newly minted currency is not 'backed' by anything. This will cause hyperinflation as the value of each 'dollar' is backed by less and less, worth less and less, i.e. failure.

At some point, the Fed will release those QE assets back into the market, and take dollars out of circulation - i.e. it's monetary policy, not just printing willy nilly.

Re:Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Shows the Truth: It Is Probably Worth... by chii on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @05:38AM (#15283060)
What's the difference between directly printing money out of thin air and creating bonds out of thin air and selling it for money (that also was printed or electronic)?
Re:Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Shows the Truth: It Is Probably Worth... by alexasmyths on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @06:56AM (#15283428)
"What's the difference between directly printing money out of thin air and creating bonds out of thin air and selling it for money (that also was printed or electronic)?"

A BOND IS A LOAN, A LEGAL OBLIGATION TO REPAY

With 100's of years of financial regulation and legal apparatus and precedence, long-standing laws, process and practices it.

It's a fundamental part of the credit system.

The price of the bond on the the markets will be a function of the coupon rate, and the 'risk' associated with the issuer actually paying back.

That's why bonds can be resold because they are worth something.

PRINTING MONEY AND SPENDING IT ON MANSIONS (or whatever) IS DILUTION

It's just making 'z dollars in circulation' no 'z*n dollars in circulation' backed by the same amount of assets, ergo, each dollar worth less.

I recommend "Investopedia.com" where you can go and look up what a 'bond' is, what a 'stock' is, what 'currency' is, and what 'central banks' do, it's a great resource.

Re:Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Shows the Truth: It Is Probably Worth... by kpil on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @07:27AM (#15283602)
There is still typically dilution when the central banks buys bonds, only that it's indirect - coming from the increased (overheated?) market value of the mansion(s) used as collateral for the bond.

It's definitely increasing the money supply in that case. If the assets are valuated at the correct price is another issue...

Re:Bitcoin’s Wild Ride Shows the Truth: It Is Probably Worth... by kpil on Tuesday September 19, 2017 @06:29AM (#15283283)
There is a huge class of money that is created when a bank issues an covered bond (backed by real estate), which is bought by a central bank.

The money is both created from thin air and at the same time connected to the underlying assets in the bond.

I'm leaning towards the opinion that it's more "air" than "matter" in that case, but you could argue that it's somehow reflecting the underlying economy somehow.