News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by gordon_freeman on Thursday September 14, 2017 @09:52PM (#15253982)
Analogy of ride-hailing service with Search engine is flawed. At the end of the day ride-hailing apps just get us from Point A to Point B whereas search engine gets us vital information on time which depends a lot on "search quality". There is no such thing as "ride quality" when deciding on using either Uber or Lyft.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by AceyMan on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:00PM (#15254242)
If "ride quality" is some kind of chimera, then these ride-sharing businesses are spinning their wheels trying to gather satisfaction metrics at the end of each ride provided (e.g., "Please rate your experience/driver/&c." questions prompted by the respective app).

My latest tactic is to answer these questions in an unnaturally enthusiastic, — yet earnest — manner, while at the same time avoiding commenting whatsoever on the ride itself.

"Kevin is proving to be a very valuable member of the team with a promising future ahead!" or some similar piffle.

I suggest everyone try it; it's an interesting challenge to invent a new variation following every ride.

(And I just imagine what such constructions do to the filtering AI they probably send these through. My goal is to have each one reach human eyeballs, but seeing as I'll never know for sure it's akin to a message in a bottle. It's still fun, though.)

Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by SOLAR_FIELDS on Thursday September 14, 2017 @09:59PM (#15254012)
There is such a thing as ride quality; I choose to ride Lyft specifically because a representative from Lyft actually gets in a driver's car and rides with them before allowing them on the platform. Though the difference in quality is much less than the difference between Google and Bing for instance.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by Karunamon on Thursday September 14, 2017 @10:54PM (#15254211)
That depends on location. They recently expanded into my city and only wanted a self-inspection. Literally a checkbox that says “yes, I verified these things”.

Uber at least demands a check sheet filled and signed by a mechanic from a list provided by them, and it has to be refreshed yearly.

Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by SOLAR_FIELDS on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:24PM (#15254352)
Perhaps it has changed in general. When I first started riding with Lyft two years ago that was policy everywhere. Maybe they realized it is not something that can be accomplished at scale. Which would be unfortunate because I know several people, women in particular, who found that policy to be a differentiator in the rideshare competition.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by furioussloth on Friday September 15, 2017 @09:40AM (#15257036)
From what I have read on driver subreddits Lyft takes far shorter time like 2 days to approve drivers as opposed to Uber which takes 2 weeks.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by pimlottc on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:42PM (#15254459)
In my experience, driving for both about two years ago, Lyft did require an in-person visit from a "mentor" to get approved, while Uber did not. Neither required any sort of technical inspection or mechanic check.