News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by SOLAR_FIELDS on Thursday September 14, 2017 @09:59PM (#15254012)
There is such a thing as ride quality; I choose to ride Lyft specifically because a representative from Lyft actually gets in a driver's car and rides with them before allowing them on the platform. Though the difference in quality is much less than the difference between Google and Bing for instance.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by Karunamon on Thursday September 14, 2017 @10:54PM (#15254211)
That depends on location. They recently expanded into my city and only wanted a self-inspection. Literally a checkbox that says “yes, I verified these things”.

Uber at least demands a check sheet filled and signed by a mechanic from a list provided by them, and it has to be refreshed yearly.

Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by SOLAR_FIELDS on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:24PM (#15254352)
Perhaps it has changed in general. When I first started riding with Lyft two years ago that was policy everywhere. Maybe they realized it is not something that can be accomplished at scale. Which would be unfortunate because I know several people, women in particular, who found that policy to be a differentiator in the rideshare competition.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by furioussloth on Friday September 15, 2017 @09:40AM (#15257036)
From what I have read on driver subreddits Lyft takes far shorter time like 2 days to approve drivers as opposed to Uber which takes 2 weeks.
Re:Alphabet considers Lyft investment of about $1B by pimlottc on Thursday September 14, 2017 @11:42PM (#15254459)
In my experience, driving for both about two years ago, Lyft did require an in-person visit from a "mentor" to get approved, while Uber did not. Neither required any sort of technical inspection or mechanic check.