But this is not the issue in this case; neither are ISIS propaganda videos.
This here is corporate and state-controlled censorship that has no legal basis at all whatsoever aimed at controlling research. That is MUCH worse than propaganda by others.
> Where do you stand on copyrighted content, on illegal > material (some of which may be legal in some countries > but not others), distasteful or offensive material?
Again - how does your comment relate to censoring research or information that the US government arbitrarily considers "illegal"?
> If you want to share politically sensitive content, > I think it's fair to say that YouTube isn't your friend.
Google runs Youtube. So, Google is not your friend. I agree with this.
There isn't anything in this world that is not political. Everything is to a varying degree.
Not everything is, should be, or needs to be political.
I also don't see what the ISO has to do with it in this case, the authors gripe is with YouTube. Regardless of their ISP, this could have happened with YouTube.
If you want to share politically sensitive content, I think it's fair to say that YouTube isn't your friend.
Regarding solutions, there are plenty of solutions for sharing video that will never result in content being taken down. thesr methods don't offer the same visibility or discovery that YouTube does, which is why they're not as popular.
If you want to provide a censorship free place to host content, you better be prepared to fight a very difficult fight. Where do you stand on copyrighted content, on illegal material (some of which may be legal in some countries but not others), distasteful or offensive material?