News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by baldeagle on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:55PM (#15233235)
The air pods were the revolution for me. This is the one thing I was looking forward to until I heard that you needed a connected iPhone as well. Now it is a non-starter. Guess I need to go test the Samsung buds.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by derimagia on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @10:12PM (#15234958)
I have AirPods and don't have an iPhone, they work with other devices with Bluetooth just fine.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by eljimmy on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @09:53PM (#15234849)
I own the Samsung pair. Don't have much good to say about them except they work... for a bit. I usually can use them for an hour and then they're completely dead.

They also can't hold a charge very long. If I charge mine up overnight, by next evening when I go to use them, they're already half dead. Great product except for very poor battery life.

Re:Apple Watch 3 by boundlessdreamz on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @02:41AM (#15236038)
Gear Icon X? The new yet unreleased version has much better battery life. 4 or 5 hours
Re:Apple Watch 3 by eljimmy on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @06:11PM (#15342993)
Yeah, Icon X, I probably should have waited for the next generation. But I suppose that can be said about any new technology being released.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by lukeholder on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @11:05PM (#15235182)
You only need the iphone for the initial setup and configuration. It doesn't need to be connected to make calls.