News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by sgarg on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @03:45PM (#15231479)
I'm with you. Before watching the keynote, I was looking forward to the new phones but the presentation made me more excited about the new Apple Watch with LTE.

I may be in a minority, but over the past few years, I've been trying to actively reduce the amount of times I pull out my phone. I feel like it will be liberating to leave home without your phone to go to dinner or go for a run, but still connected through the Apple Watch. Although it will still display notifications, I personally won't be tempted to browse Twitter or Instagram when I have a free moment.

Re:Apple Watch 3 by ozmbie on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:26PM (#15232947)
Some days my phone feels like an LTE modem I have to carry around for the sake of my Apple watch.

Going to work, listening to music, replying to messages, going for a run and then stopping by the shops to pay for things...all using my wrist. It's a great experience. But I have to keep my phone nearby. And LTE watch sounds great.

There are a lot of UX issues with the watch that makes it frustrating at times. But it's getting better and more capable every OS update.

Re:Apple Watch 3 by pm90 on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:28PM (#15232981)
Hmm, the watch really has done just that for me. Most of the times, I leave it in my pocket. When I get a text, I glance at my watch to read it. Any notifications come directly to my watch.

Honestly, I really don't see the benefit of going through the additional burden of getting a new cellphone plan, SIM, paying more for ... what? One advantage is definitely that in emergency situations (i.e. on a run without the phone, hike etc) you can now call from the watch. But I just don't see any other benefit.

Re:Apple Watch 3 by uberjoe on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @05:31AM (#15236742)
Hm, but it's using the same phone number so I think that the Sim will register with the Sim in your phone. Setup will all have to be done from your phone.

I don't think that you will need a new plan, I think that it will use your current plan.

Or did I get the wrong end of the stick?

Re:Apple Watch 3 by baldeagle on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:55PM (#15233235)
The air pods were the revolution for me. This is the one thing I was looking forward to until I heard that you needed a connected iPhone as well. Now it is a non-starter. Guess I need to go test the Samsung buds.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by derimagia on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @10:12PM (#15234958)
I have AirPods and don't have an iPhone, they work with other devices with Bluetooth just fine.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by eljimmy on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @09:53PM (#15234849)
I own the Samsung pair. Don't have much good to say about them except they work... for a bit. I usually can use them for an hour and then they're completely dead.

They also can't hold a charge very long. If I charge mine up overnight, by next evening when I go to use them, they're already half dead. Great product except for very poor battery life.

Re:Apple Watch 3 by boundlessdreamz on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @02:41AM (#15236038)
Gear Icon X? The new yet unreleased version has much better battery life. 4 or 5 hours
Re:Apple Watch 3 by eljimmy on Tuesday September 26, 2017 @06:11PM (#15342993)
Yeah, Icon X, I probably should have waited for the next generation. But I suppose that can be said about any new technology being released.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by lukeholder on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @11:05PM (#15235182)
You only need the iphone for the initial setup and configuration. It doesn't need to be connected to make calls.