Re:At liberal tech companies, those who disagree on politics...
by zimpenfish on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @05:54AM
(#15182375)
> If Trump's audio conservation had not leaked, he would have won by even larger margin.
Unless you can show some evidence for this, it's just an unprovable counterfactual and completely useless.
Re:At liberal tech companies, those who disagree on politics...
by AmIFirstToThink on Wednesday September 06, 2017 @01:35PM
(#15185529)
You looking for sauce? Sauce is in Hillary's bag. You are welcome.
In other words, if you don't agree, you can safely ignore the comment, or take upon yourself to prove it wrong.
Re:At liberal tech companies, those who disagree on politics...
by zimpenfish on Friday September 08, 2017 @05:45AM
(#15198991)
If you take that stance, then your options are:
1. 45% of the voting people in USA support sexually assaulting women.
Are you OK with that understanding? Do you not find something unsettling about saying 45% people in USA are OK for sexually assaulting women? The same conservative family oriented people, the same law and order people, the same god and sins people are supportive of sexually assaulting women? Can we have survived as a nation so far if so many people supported sexually assaulting women?
2. Hillary still lost to such person. What does that say about Hillary?
If Trump's audio conservation had not leaked, he would have won by even larger margin. What does THAT say about Hillary? Why do you think that was the case?