Re:Why China's crypto crackdown is 'bigger than most people ...
by DenisM on Monday September 04, 2017 @01:44PM
(#15169714)
For those skimming comments: it's the ICO (new crypto-currency) crackdown, not a crackdown on crypto algorithms or implementations.
I sense a trend to call cryptocurrencies just "crypto", hence the word "crypto" is at risk of losing its (original) meaning. I'm afraid this is going to become another hacker/cracker type of situation...
Re:Why China's crypto crackdown is 'bigger than most people ...
by davidgerard on Monday September 04, 2017 @02:07PM
(#15169837)
> I sense a trend to call cryptocurrencies just "crypto", hence the word "crypto" is at risk of losing its (original) meaning. I'm afraid this is going to become another hacker/cracker type of situation...
I am sorry to tell you it's pretty much financial jargon now, much as it pains me too.
Re:Why China's crypto crackdown is 'bigger than most people ...
by marcosdumay on Monday September 04, 2017 @02:16PM
(#15169891)
It's way more likely that it will stay a context sensitive jargon. It's different from the hacker/cracker situation in that both meanings can not apply to the same subject.
Re:Why China's crypto crackdown is 'bigger than most people ...
by jxramos on Monday September 04, 2017 @01:58PM
(#15169791)
interesting to see these developments as they unfold, I wonder who's ultimately at fault, somewhat sloppy imprecise journalism or the the propagation of an honest mistake. Kind of like the tin can on a string game.
Re:Why China's crypto crackdown is 'bigger than most people ...
by zkSNARK on Monday September 04, 2017 @01:56PM
(#15169782)
China has been cracking down on crypto-currency related things perpetually since 2013 bubble. People used it as an boogyman every time the price went down. It won't matter in the end just as it never did before.
Re:Why China's crypto crackdown is 'bigger than most people ...
by majewsky on Monday September 04, 2017 @03:53PM
(#15170475)
Works for me with uMatrix. My default setting blocks all third-party JS, but lets first-party JS through. The page renders correctly for me as far as I can tell.
I sense a trend to call cryptocurrencies just "crypto", hence the word "crypto" is at risk of losing its (original) meaning. I'm afraid this is going to become another hacker/cracker type of situation...
I am sorry to tell you it's pretty much financial jargon now, much as it pains me too.
But it will certainly lead to plenty of confusion
PASS.