Announcing Rust 1.20

Re:Announcing Rust 1.20 by pjmlp on Friday September 01, 2017 @02:20AM (#15146541)

This is why, as a user of GC languages, I think a bit sad that the ergonomics are so bad for cyclic data structures, that this solution is most likely what the majority will turn to.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Announcing Rust 1.20 by kazagistar on Friday September 01, 2017 @02:59AM (#15146687)

Thr majority never need to write a cyclic data structure, because they can use an existing one from a library.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Announcing Rust 1.20 by pjmlp on Friday September 01, 2017 @03:34AM (#15146797)

Assuming it covers their use case, regarding API definition and O(n) expectations.

[ Parent | on HN ]