Re:More Accurate World Map Wins Prestigious Design Award (2016)
by torgoguys on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @08:19AM
(#15123754)
I'd argue with the "most accurate" designation the article uses. There are lots of projections out there. Use the one that best optimizes for the things you care about.
This projection is neat, but has its own obvious tradeoffs (e.g., difficult to readily see how some landmasses relate to each other spacially. Antarctica in particular).
Re:More Accurate World Map Wins Prestigious Design Award (2016)
by PLenz on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @08:14AM
(#15123731)
Ugh, it's not more accurate, hell accurate don't even mean anything here. This is just a projection that makes different compromises making a pseudo sphere fit on to a plane. Projections are tools, different ones have different uses.
Re:More Accurate World Map Wins Prestigious Design Award (2016)
by ben11kehoe on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @08:17AM
(#15123741)
It's also more or less equivalent to the Dymaxion map but stretches instead of disconnecting, which is a bit misleading, I think.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymaxion_map
Re:More Accurate World Map Wins Prestigious Design Award (2016)
by knz on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @08:24AM
(#15123785)
This is interesting and I understand how every map is a compromise but it really bothers me how distant this projection makes Antarctica look from New Zealand (one of the gateway countries to the continent, especially the Ross Ice Shelf area).
Re:More Accurate World Map Wins Prestigious Design Award (2016)
by notatoad on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @08:24AM
(#15123787)
That was my first reaction, until i remembered that i've seen a globe before, and my general perception of the shapes of countries is informed by a globe and not just the mercator projection.
This map might bill itself as "the most accurate", but it's still making some crazy distortions. Mercator might get some sizes wrong, but it gets the shapes mostly right.
Re:More Accurate World Map Wins Prestigious Design Award (2016)
by ghaff on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @08:16AM
(#15123738)
It looks as if this map generally is designed to localize the inevitable shape distortions to areas where there isn't "interesting" detail and therefore those distortions aren't as obvious. But because of the way Brazil sticks out, it ended up getting stretched a fair bit.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12821637
This projection is neat, but has its own obvious tradeoffs (e.g., difficult to readily see how some landmasses relate to each other spacially. Antarctica in particular).
Australia: 7.7 million km²
United States: 9.8 million km²
Europe: 10.2 million km²
Russia: 17.1 million km²
Africa: 30.37 million km²
This map might bill itself as "the most accurate", but it's still making some crazy distortions. Mercator might get some sizes wrong, but it gets the shapes mostly right.