News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by Bromskloss on Saturday August 26, 2017 @07:50PM (#15108124)
> The sport aims to be an R&D center for road going technology.

This continues to surprise me. Is that really what is attractive to the audience?

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by DC-3 on Saturday August 26, 2017 @07:56PM (#15108146)
You've just brushed upon one of the biggest debates in modern motorsport. If you are interested in reading further there's many great opinion pieces on both sides of the fence. Here's one interesting piece written recently by ex-F1 driver Stefan Johansson [1].

[1] http://www.racer.com/more/viewpoints/item/143400-johansson-m...

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by lqdc13 on Saturday August 26, 2017 @09:41PM (#15108575)
I've been watching MotoGP recently instead of F1 for some of those reasons. Much more enjoyable, dangerous and unpredictable. And you don't go around an oval unlike indycar.
Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by Bromskloss on Saturday August 26, 2017 @10:23PM (#15108747)
> And you don't go around an oval unlike indycar.

I just came back from looking up the IndyCar tracks for this reason, to see what non-ovals there are. :-) I prefer road courses, myself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IndyCar_Series_racetra...

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by jdietrich on Saturday August 26, 2017 @08:30PM (#15108288)
It's attractive to the manufacturers. F1 is stupendously expensive, so manufacturers want to get maximum bang for their buck in terms of marketing. Trickle-down technology is a major marketing hook, particularly for McLaren and Ferrari. Both companies introduced KERS- and DRS-inspired systems on their road cars when they were added to the F1 rules.

This is much clearer in other racing formulae, where the cars being raced may be modified versions of commercially-available road cars. Audi, Subaru and Mitsubishi built their reputation for performance almost entirely off the back of the World Rally Championship.

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by Bromskloss on Saturday August 26, 2017 @09:12PM (#15108460)
> manufacturers want to get maximum bang for their buck in terms of marketing

Sure, and I thought that you would have to do something that was attractive to the audience for the marketing to work.

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by disordinary on Saturday August 26, 2017 @08:33PM (#15108302)
F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports, it's the most expensive racing series out there and one of the most advanced. Every team builds designs and builds their own cars and has new models for every season and then throughout the season they work hard and spend untold millions and man hours improving the cars.

A lot of the fan base is really engaged in the technology race while others are engaged in the personalities, that is what makes the sport so popular as it has a lot of entertainment to offer outside of what actually happens on the track.

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by philjohn on Sunday August 27, 2017 @04:23AM (#15109713)
People watch F1 for different reasons.

Some people love the crashes, others love the personalities.

Me? I love the racing, the personalities, but most of all I love all the technical developments on the cars. These are fragile prototype cars with state-of-the-art engines (approaching 50% efficiency, which is insane) - new car launch time in F1 just before winter testing is one of my favourites!

Re:Honda system confused by Alonso taking Pouhon flat by InitialLastName on Sunday August 27, 2017 @09:41AM (#15110733)
This. I watch F1 because it's the closest thing I can find to a public engineering competition.