News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Epistle 3 by m3rc on Friday August 25, 2017 @09:29AM (#15098232)
Exactly. Not only will we never see HL3, we SHOULD never see HL3. It's so ubiquitous as some sort of second coming of Gaming Christ that no option existed except to have it be disappointing. It would have been Duke Nukem all over again.
Re:Epistle 3 by jamesrcole on Friday August 25, 2017 @09:44AM (#15098329)
I don't believe that. From all reports Duke Nukem Forever was a pretty flawed game (I haven't played it). If they did HL3 and did a good job of it, then they've made a good game, and I think there'll be enough people who will appreciate that.
Re:Epistle 3 by m3rc on Friday August 25, 2017 @10:29AM (#15098692)
Sure, but the effort would be better spent on another Valve project. HL3 just straight can't live up to expectations, it will be disappointing no matter how good it is because it's been drummed up for years and years as the best possible game, it just is an impossibility to be as good as everyone thinks it'll be.
Re:Epistle 3 by frahs on Friday August 25, 2017 @03:09PM (#15101285)
I don't think so. I mean, read the story. It's written really well. Many years passed between Half Life 1 and Half Life 2, and yet #2 was very successful.

Another example is TF2.