Re:As Coding Boot Camps Close, the Field Faces a Reality Check
by aczerepinski on Friday August 25, 2017 @08:37AM
(#15097955)
A 93% failure rate is absurdly high, and probably more indicative of an inadequate hiring process than "bootcamp grads are all dumb lolz". Are there any examples you could share of relevant interview questions that this group faked their way through, but later were revealed to not understand? Have the hiring managers since been mentored on how to do a better job vetting candidates?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:As Coding Boot Camps Close, the Field Faces a Reality Check
by phatbyte on Friday August 25, 2017 @09:53AM
(#15098389)
This was more than 2 years ago, I don't work there anymore. But to my best recall, the interview process was pretty straightforward, mostly revolved around basic programming knowledge (we knew we were aiming at junior devs). Basic programming questions (what is an object, an array, etc..), a few question on to approach a particular problem and lastly they were presented with vanilla JS file, with bugs and things that could be improved.
No algorithms, or data structures or complex problems to solve. Something that I would include if these were fresh college grads or senior developers with extensive background.
Again, I didn't mean to call anyone dumb, I don't think these people are dumb at all, they were just bad/fast trained.
Re:As Coding Boot Camps Close, the Field Faces a Reality Check
by dcole2929 on Friday August 25, 2017 @01:52PM
(#15100633)
>> presented with vanilla JS file, with bugs and things that could be improved.
Uhhh that's really difficult in js even for experienced devs. Way too much non deterministic behavior. I hope this exercise came with tests and a working debugger.