News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I Still Use Vim by geodel on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:23AM (#15080487)
> I don't need a car that goes 200MPH but that doesn't mean every F1 car is entirely useless, just that it's designed for a different purpose.

Those cars use huge resources for extreme performance. I don't think Atom provides extreme performance even after using extreme resources.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by Klathmon on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:29AM (#15080519)
It depends on what you consider "performance".

An F1 car is going to be the worst tow truck in existence. It's "towing performance" is basically a 0/100.

Atom's "extreme performance" for me is in my productivity. the 2GB of ram that my atom windows are currently using is a very very small price to pay for better productivity.

Even if Atom were so resource hungry that I needed to buy a new laptop every other year for $5000 (which I don't), if it makes me more than 2% more productive, it's paid for itself.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by xg15 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:45AM (#15080611)
> Atom's "extreme performance" for me is in my productivity

Yet there are lots of people who are extremely productive with vim. So I don't think you can pit subjective metrics (productivity) against objective (RAM usage) here.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by scott_o on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @08:08AM (#15080764)
Why not? Its just that for the subjective metrics people will have different opinions and therefore draw different conclusions about which one is "better"

Which is the OPs exact point. While some people value their editor being very light on ram, other people value other things, and that's okay.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by c0ndu17 on Friday August 25, 2017 @04:27AM (#15096994)
Have you tried vim? When I say tried, attempted to actually get into it. Not accidentally open it && stack overflow how to quit. You can easily do what you mention in vim... and I have no doubt, much quicker. Let's not forget vim gives you the power of cli, in addition to all it's other text manipulation benefits.
Re:Why I Still Use Vim by geodel on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @08:50AM (#15081066)
> Atom's "extreme performance" for me is in my productivity.

Thats fair. I also find Nissan sentra lot more productive than high perf cars. But if I claim it is extreme performance car in a room full of people, I do not know people will be polite or laugh me out of room.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by pleasecalllater on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:39AM (#15080584)
I think any discussion with you is pointless. You just love this editor, and whatever things you need to sacrifice to use it are file. This includes buying a new laptop each year, using only small files, buying more ram etc.

I'm just too old for flame wars with their-own-church believers. I just need to write code, so I switch tools to appropriate ones. It's just a tool. I'm sure that some hammer-loving guys do all things with hammers, even if that's terribly hard.

If you really think that Atom has "extreme performance", you really don't know other tools that are on the market.

Good luck, the hardware industry will love you even more.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by dang on Thursday August 24, 2017 @02:56AM (#15088171)
This is unduly personal. That breaks the site guidelines. Please post civilly and substantively or not at all.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by Klathmon on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:49AM (#15080643)
I really feel I described why I think that pretty well.

If you are more productive doing things another way, that's fantastic! I use IDEA when i'm working in Java code, I use Atom when i'm working with web stuff, I use tail/grep when searching through log files, I use CLI tools as much as possible for everything else as they integrate with things like editors and IDE's very easily.

Everything is a tradeoff, and nothing is perfect. Atom enables me to be a better dev in some areas, and is frustratingly awful in others. But I do genuinely love the editor. I'm glad someone has finally made the tradeoffs that I prefer in an editor, as for me reducing memory usage by a few hundred MB will make literally 0 difference in my life, but adding the ability to click a spot in the embedded browser window and have it take me to the code that defines that component is a nice productivity boost.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by nimchimpsky on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:37AM (#15080568)
> better productivity

than what ? wtf is worse than atom. Even notepad++ is better.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by christogreeff on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:51AM (#15080659)
Better in which way? In your daily usage scenario? Memory usage? I'm sure there will be cases where Vim or notepad++ works better for me. At present, vscode works for 90%+ of the things I need to do. For my usage scenario, notepad++ is not better than vscode. Use whatever application works for you, but don't say something is better or worse, without looking at it subjectively.
Re:Why I Still Use Vim by nimchimpsky on Wednesday August 30, 2017 @09:42PM (#15137524)
why are you talking about vscode ?

Last time I used visual studio it was great, levels of magnitude better than notepad++, but not quite as good as intellij.

Re:Why I Still Use Vim by emsy on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @07:38AM (#15080574)
It does (to the op) and the op explains how. Performance is not always the speed of the editor.
Re:Why I Still Use Vim by baybal2 on Wednesday August 23, 2017 @08:50AM (#15081062)
Page polution - most mid-tier desktop software developers today don't even know what it is