Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by nsxwolf on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:23PM
(#15041153)
If your disability had been repaired with, say, CRISPR, you'd be alive right now and without that disability. Had your disability been removed via "selection", you wouldn't exist.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by ng12 on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:27PM
(#15041188)
You're technically right for some definition of "me", but I don't think that's a particularly useful way to think about it. My parents would have instead had a healthier version of "me".
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by tanilama on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:25PM
(#15041165)
The same argument would also be used to ban abortion, just you know.
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by tonmoy on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:36PM
(#15041262)
And morning after pills
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by mmirate on Friday August 18, 2017 @04:17PM
(#15049395)
Even though I've no disabilities per se, I would gladly trade my own existence for that of a genetically-superior sibling.
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by mmirate on Monday August 21, 2017 @02:47PM
(#15066699)
(Being a superior being, such a sibling would deserve their existence more than I do mine.)
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by eloisius on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:30PM
(#15041217)
If it was "repaired" with CRISPR, would the person that is ng12 exist, or would some other child belonging to ng12's parents exist?
Are we not a product of our experiences, or do you really think every zygote is endowed with some kind or unique soul?
Re:China’s embrace of embryo selection raises thorny questions
by WillPostForFood on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:49PM
(#15041355)
Replace "unique soul" with "unique set of genetic attributes."