News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by bad_user on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:46AM (#14977352)
After being a Chrome user for several years, I've switched back to Firefox for the past two years or so and I'm really, really happy with it.

Latest version does multi-processing, e10s is finally here (though it might still get disabled by usage of certain add-ons, I remember I had to force it to stay enabled).

On performance, in the past it felt sluggish, but now Firefox is fast and for my usage patterns it uses less memory than Chrome.

And one thing I really love is the Awesome Bar, which is a pain point every single time I open Chrome. I have a lot of websites I need to return to and in Chrome I end up searching on Google far more than I should. I guess that's the biggest difference between Firefox and Chrome, as Mozilla does not feel obligated to shareholders to extract ads clicks from you (although I hope that whatever they do keeps them afloat).

Also, tab management. I installed "Tab Center" from the Test Pilot and it's awesome. The experiment is now over unfortunately and the code itself for Tab Center isn't compatible with WebExtensions, but there's work going on to port it and that highlights that Firefox's WebExtensions will be more flexible than Chrome, if they aren't already.

But in the end I actually care more about trusting my browser and its maker to protect my interests. I actually trust Google more than I trust other companies, but something feels very wrong for a company to have so much leverage on me. Which is why, as long as I have a choice, I'll always prefer Firefox over Chrome, or Safari, or Edge.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by exDM69 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:13AM (#14978184)
To me, the best feature of Firefox compared to Chromium (both out of the box, no extensions. not sure if there are extensions that could help) is the address bar. Firefox does a fuzzy search into your browsing history and if you visit the same sites often, the suggestions are quite good.

Contrast this with Chrome, where the idea behind address bar user experience seems to be maximizing the number of Google searches done.

But the one that really keeps me on Firefox is Vimperator. It's the best keyboard oriented browser UI in mainstream browsers. The extensions available for Chrome are nowhere near as good (last time I tried).

The worst part of Firefox is the terribly long startup time. It can take up to 10 seconds after a reboot and takes quite a long time even with warm caches. Chromium startup is near instantaneous.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by vanderZwan on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:28AM (#14978274)
> The worst part of Firefox is the terribly long startup time. It can take up to 10 seconds after a reboot and takes quite a long time even with warm caches.

If you're the type with a lot of tabs open, that should improve a lot in the next few releases.

https://metafluff.com/2017/07/21/i-am-a-tab-hoarder/index.ht...

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by exDM69 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:45AM (#14978346)
> If you're the type with a lot of tabs open

I'm not and I don't store/restore tabs on close, so that's not the case here. It's just Firefox + Vimperator + uBlock origin with about:blank as home page.

I'm on Linux/X11 if that matters.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by bovine3dom on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:06AM (#14978456)
This is probably a good place to plug the fact that Vimperator is going to die with FF57 [1].

If anyone wants to help with making an alternative, look through that thread. I'm particularly invested in Tridactyl [2] but other people are working on others.

[1] https://github.com/vimperator/vimperator-labs/issues/705

[2] https://github.com/cmcaine/tridactyl

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by ronjouch on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:26AM (#14978567)
Not strictly feature-equivalent, but there's already a working (I use it everyday) port of Vimium for Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vimium-ff/
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by StevePerkins on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:11AM (#14978823)
I've been using VimFX all along, which is actively maintained and already compatible with multiprocess.

It's a web browser, not an actual text editor. 99% of the time, you're just wanting familiar keyboard commands for navigation. It feels like Vimperator does so many impractical things almost tongue-in-cheek, just to show how cool it is that they're theoretically possible.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by ronjouch on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:57AM (#14979135)
VimFx is not compatible with multiprocess, it will stop working soon.

See https://github.com/akhodakivskiy/VimFx/issues/860 :

    - You can use the current VimFx for the rest of 2017.
    - Then, Vimium is your best bet: philc/vimium#2425
    - VimFx is free software, so if somebody feels like converting it to a WebExtension they're totally free to do so! (But you're probably going to spend your time more wisely on Vimium.)
    - I hope to create a new add-on with the best parts from VimFx some day.
    - Firefox will become a better browser! It’s sad but worth the sacrifice.
Vimium-FF does works right now: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vimium-ff/
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by nemetroid on Friday August 11, 2017 @11:18AM (#14990514)
VimFx is perfectly compatible with multiprocess, as stated in the issue you linked:

https://github.com/akhodakivskiy/VimFx/issues/860#issuecomme...

The issue is that VimFx is not feasible to convert into a WebExtension.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by inyourtenement on Thursday August 10, 2017 @12:28PM (#14981317)
Ugh, that sucks, I just switched to VimFx because I thought it was ff57+ compatible. Now I'm not sure where I got that idea.

I haven't used vimium-ff, but it hasn't been updated in 3 months and the comments on mozilla are not encouraging.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by ronjouch on Thursday August 10, 2017 @02:25PM (#14982631)
Well, "soon" is tomorrow August 11: "PSA: Legacy extensions disabled by default on Nightly": https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/dev-addons/2017-August/00...
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by bovine3dom on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:16AM (#14979293)
I disagree, respectfully.

I like that there's always more stuff to learn about Vimperator. It's fun. There's a nice thread on GitHub where people are talking about their favourite features:

https://github.com/vimperator/vimperator-labs/issues/729

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by simias on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:01AM (#14978438)
That's odd, from SSD a cold firefox start takes a few seconds on my debian testing (using firefox 54 from apt). Maybe you're using a slow HDD?
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by exDM69 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:35AM (#14978628)
Nope. It's a lightning fast m.2 SSD. And warm caches don't help either.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by vanderZwan on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:26AM (#14978910)
Are Vimperator + uBlock origin the only active add-ons? The Ubuntu Modifications one is known to cause slowdowns, for example.

What happens if you try to completely reset the Firefox profile, and bring back the plugins you want?

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by exDM69 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:49AM (#14979603)
Happens without any extensions. I'm on Arch Linux, not Ubuntu.

I don't care enough to debug it further. Firefox is stable enough these days that restarting it isn't even a daily occurence. I have enough patience to wait that 10+ seconds, it's just a minor annoyance.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by baby on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:39AM (#14978648)
> If you're the type with a lot of tabs open

Then pray for Tree Style Tabs to be implemented by default in Firefox.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by snakeanus on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:34AM (#14978959)
I hope not. I believe that it is better for Firefox to be as light and bloat-free by default while users are free to install whatever addon provides any extra features that they need.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by baby on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:16AM (#14979295)
Tree Style Tab could be an opt-in functionality of vanilla Firefox, that wouldn't be an issue for new users.

Although I firmly believed that tabs on the side make more sense for any kind of users. Nesting tabs require a bit more practice though and that could be an opt-in option.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by CWuestefeld on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:44AM (#14979540)
As far as I can tell, it doesn't look like this - one of my favorite plugins - will survive v57.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by steveklabnik on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:56AM (#14979656)
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by CWuestefeld on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:05AM (#14980427)
Thanks. I'd seen that thread months ago; it seems that the situation has improved a bit since then.

As I was searching around, I also came across this:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tree-tabs/

...which looks to have similar functionality, and is already WE compatible.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by rdsubhas on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:44AM (#14978692)
Especially when we know we have browsed a site before but forgot the URL and remember only some portions of the title.

Firefox address bar is just more productive in simple things like re-opening frequent/historical sites.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by cesarb on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:24AM (#14978905)
In my experience, whenever Firefox takes more than a couple of seconds to start up, I know my Internet connection is acting up. It appears to be doing some sort of blocking network lookup on the startup path, and opens the intial window only after it succeeds or times out.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by psychometry on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:31AM (#14980684)
One thing that helps with Chrome's address bar is typing in a slash when searching for a site in your history. Suppose I visited this URL:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lognormal_distribution

Chrome might or might not suggest it when I start typing "logn...". But if I type "/logn" it's there immediately. They're tokenizing URLs in a stupid way, apparently.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by mijoharas on Thursday August 10, 2017 @10:33AM (#14980072)
> But the one that really keeps me on Firefox is Vimperator. It's the best keyboard oriented browser UI in mainstream browsers. The extensions available for Chrome are nowhere near as good (last time I tried).

Did you ever use vimium on chrome? It's part of what keeps me on Chrome, I remember I had a quick glance at Vimperator a fair while ago, but switched back to chrome as it was what I was used to. I keep wondering about trying again.

Can you talk about the trade-offs between them?

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by Vinnl on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:27AM (#14978266)
This is supposedly a lot better with Firefox 55, released this week :)
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by jhasse on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:02AM (#14978447)
Only for restoring lots of tabs.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by govg on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:18AM (#14978519)
And by god is it fast now. I have in excess of 200 tabs open in various groups (RIP Tab groups), and didn't remember that my Firefox had updated. I open Firefox, see it startup instantly and my first reaction was that Firefox somehow forgot all the tabs that I had loaded and had just started a new window. Imagine my surprise when everything was just as I wanted!
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by Vinnl on Thursday August 10, 2017 @05:00PM (#14984216)
Yeah, I have a strong hunch that a ten-second startup time is due to restoring lots of tabs.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by nothis on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:08AM (#14977460)
You mention tab management. One of the main reasons I like Firefox is due to one, exemplary addon: Tab Mix Plus. It's the kind of tinker-y addon that lets you do almost anything that is typical for Firefox.

With ad-blocking especially, I just can't trust Google to be fully supportive. I mean, who are we kidding? It's literally their business model.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by Ntrails on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:44AM (#14977701)
One thing I've been finding lately with firefox is that the Netflix website is abysmally slow. It lags on loading, goes unresponsive a lot etc etc.

I've always watched twitch in Chrome (second browser, other screen, works fine) because firefox used to be bad. It's likely that I will start doing the same with Netflix.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by Certhas on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:46AM (#14977726)
Make some noise to Netflix then to make sure their Website works with Firefox.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by 0x27081990 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:45AM (#14978699)
If you can watch Netflix with Firefox, sounds like you're on Windows or macOS.

The best browsers for Netflix are IE or Safari. Chrome and Firefox support up to 720p only.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by NoGravitas on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:18AM (#14978864)
You can watch Netflix with Firefox on Linux, but the first time you do, it has to download a plugin, and you have to reload the window.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by TheAceOfHearts on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:02AM (#14979178)
Not many people seem to be aware of this, but Firefox Mobile is just as great! You can run full extensions, just like on desktop.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by sirfz on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:53AM (#14980913)
I use Firefox Mobile as well but to be fair extension-support is flakey. A lot of times I install an extension that doesn't work and nothing indicates whether it does or doesn't. Also the extensions store doesn't indicate whether and extension is mobile friendly or not.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by yadenoyad on Thursday August 10, 2017 @02:55PM (#14982913)
Oh man plugin support on mobile, this is a game changer for me. If only Firefox supported 2fa with an authenticator app I would have no hesitation using Firefox as my main browser.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by amq on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:49AM (#14980874)
I'm using Firefox on desktop, but Mobile scrolling is just awful even on a flagship smartphone. Just also tried nightly: the same.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by mistermann on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:38AM (#14979470)
> Latest version does multi-processing, e10s is finally here (though it might still get disabled by usage of certain add-ons, I remember I had to force it to stay enabled).

Are multi-processing and e10s separate things?

How do you forcefully enable it? 5/7 of my addins are listed as Legacy so I am still in single process mode, I am dying to try multi-process!

EDIT: See here: https://www.ghacks.net/2016/07/22/multi-process-firefox/

EDIT 2: Doesn't seem to work, for me anyways. It appears to be enabled in about:config but I only see one process running in task manager.

EDIT 3: I lied, it does work, 8 processes running now.

ALSO: Does anyone know if tree-style tabs will be made compatible, or if there is something comparable that is?

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by baby on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:46AM (#14977724)
Tree Style Tab is the biggest difference for me, if you haven't used it before you are probably slow to browse the web :)
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by haddr on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:49AM (#14978365)
I like a lot the "tabs outliner" extension for Chrome. It's especially useful when you work with many tabs open at the same time, and want to preserve sessions, etc. Unfortunately there is now alternative to that in Firefox. Session Manager comes close, but is painful to use. So I'm still looking forward to such extension for Firefox, because honestly I prefer FF to Chrome for most of the things.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by baby on Thursday August 10, 2017 @07:38AM (#14978643)
Honestly nothing beats Tree Style Tab, have you tried it?
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by konart on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:11AM (#14979253)
I've tried it. Three times, I guess, since the early versions of it. All three times I found it useless even though I usually have 30+ tabs opened.

Honestly, this kind of statement is nothing but a superstition that you usually hear from people that think that it's impossible to be productive using different approaches.

For me nothings beats Vimium's "T" or Session Buddy + Keepin' Tabs extensions pair.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by baby on Thursday August 10, 2017 @09:20AM (#14979326)
That is odd, you should try to use for longer periods of time. I personally use it with hundreds of tabs open and I haven't found anything else that can compare.

> Honestly, this kind of statement is nothing but a superstition that you usually hear from people that think that it's impossible to be productive using different approaches.

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure I'm more productive than you. We should compare each other browsing reddit some day.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by konart on Friday August 11, 2017 @05:39AM (#14987991)
>That is odd, you should try to use for longer periods of time. I personally use it with hundreds of tabs open and I haven't found anything else that can compare.

I'm using fork when eating pasta. Still, my chinese friends tell me that nothing beats sticks and I should just try to use them for longer periods of time.

See what I did here?

Your assumtion is baseless. You don't know for how logh I've been using it, nor do you know about the results (aside from the fact that I don't use it anymore).

>Maybe, but I'm pretty sure I'm more productive than you. We should compare each other browsing reddit some day.

I'm sorry, but "browsing reddit" and "productive" are on opposite sides of scale for me.

You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how childish it may be.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by baby on Friday August 11, 2017 @06:45AM (#14988270)
chopsticks > forks
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by spiralx on Thursday August 10, 2017 @08:30AM (#14978936)
Tab Outliner does all of that and more as far as I can tell. I'm certainly happy using it.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by CWuestefeld on Thursday August 10, 2017 @10:02AM (#14979742)
Perhaps the biggest reason I use Firefox is for Tree Style Tabs. I've tried to find something equivalent in Chrome.

I installed Tab Outliner briefly, and honestly, I couldn't figure out what the heck it was trying to do. Maybe my mental capacity is too limited, but as far as I could tell it didn't get me one iota closer to my goal. What I've settled on, for the times when I need to use Chrome, is an external helper app called Sidewise.

So Tab Outliner needs to do a LOT more to make its operation more discoverable if it wants more users.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by spiralx on Thursday August 17, 2017 @05:33AM (#15035102)
It's certainly not obvious, I'd agree with that. It's a kind of a hybrid of tabs, sessions and bookmarks as far as I use it.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by pmlnr on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:54AM (#14977770)
> On performance, in the past it felt sluggish, but now Firefox is fast and for my usage patterns it uses less memory than Chrome.

/me remembers how fast FF was compared to IE 'back in the days'.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by Suro on Thursday August 10, 2017 @05:14AM (#14977887)
Well, bear in mind that websites was way simpler to render for a browser back then.
Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by moosingin3space on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:19AM (#14980568)
Also keep in mind that Mozilla is researching better rendering methods through the Quantum project. The potential boost will be huge -- CSS styling and compositing will be faster, JS code that interacts with the DOM will be faster, etc.

I'm very excited about Quantum CSS and Quantum DOM landing.

Re:uBlock Origin Maintainer on Chrome vs. Firefox WebExtensions by sametmax on Friday August 11, 2017 @06:53AM (#14988321)
+1. The perfs on Firefox have improved so much. And the new test pilots are awesome. I freaking love tab containers.