Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by jorgemf on Thursday August 10, 2017 @12:59AM
(#14976556)
She means that aiming to 50-50 doesn't represent the skills set. As women are more skilled for that job they should have more representation (based on the biological theory). If it is a 50-50 you are promoting men in the positions when you shouldn't. (the disadvantaged group here are the men)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by bendmorris on Thursday August 10, 2017 @01:07AM
(#14976601)
You're missing my point. If women would naturally have more representation and were disadvantaged by this policy, and the policy was 100% effective (unheard of), their representation would drop from >50% to 50% - it wouldn't somehow switch to women being significantly underrepresented. This assertion doesn't make sense based on the actual situation we have today.
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by jorgemf on Thursday August 10, 2017 @01:14AM
(#14976642)
I don't know if I understand you. We have the situation we have today because "biases and unequal opportunities".
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by michaelchisari on Thursday August 10, 2017 @02:12AM
(#14976926)
I think the person you're responding to is assuming that we are already at a decently fair equilibrium, and that diversity and other concepts and goals are disrupting that equilibrium. I think the biggest failure of communication around these issues is that a lot of people arguing against these programs are coming at it from the just world hypothesis.