Why did you link that, can you provide more context?

It doesn't seem like a massive deal according to what they state: he made a joke and it wasn't well received. They never say what the joke is or what about it was sexist.

The salient excerpt:

> while they described the skits as typically a “roast,” they emphasized that “the goal is not to offend.”

Really just seems like some more character assassination by Gizmodo.

If the administration of Harvard felt they needed to formally apologize it seems unlikely Gizmodo just gined this up out of nothing.

No one has looked to school administrators for moral guidance in many, many years.

> more ... assassination

You can't kill something that's dead.

I was referring to the semantic oddity of killing something twice. I suppose one could try to kill a zombie, which is already dead.

James, you should really stay off the of the internet. The reaction to your antics may be depressing.

Justin, that's a very weird reply and to be honest you sound deranged.

Here's an interview with James:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=TN1vEfqHGro

We've banned this account for violating the HN guidelines.

In general, also, we ban accounts that use HN primarily for political or ideological battle, since that's destructive of the mandate of the site. Would you please not create accounts to do this with?

I submitted that yesterday.

Whatever you think of this guy it doesn't surprise me that this other stuff is coming out. It seems like you would have seen his views in his behavior in the past... which these new things seem to show.