Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by avaer on Monday August 07, 2017 @09:56PM
(#14952986)
Right, wrong, damage, and safety are precisely the dressed-up fashions PG's essay talks about.
[dead]
[dead]
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by ctlby on Monday August 07, 2017 @10:16PM
(#14953195)
Please stop peddling this science denialism. There is great consensus outside the intellectually-bankrupt fields of sociology and gender studies.
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by ajross on Monday August 07, 2017 @10:31PM
(#14953350)
If you're going to assert a scientific consensus, my friend, you're going to have to cite one.
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by ctlby on Monday August 07, 2017 @11:01PM
(#14953636)
Start with Halpern's "Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities" and follow the bibliography where it takes you (I really would like to provide the references, but just I don't have the patience to copy them now). For something rigorous that's digitally available, start with sapinker's slides from his 2005 debate [1]. Modern understanding is quite similar, only with new evidence and insights from evolutionary psychology and neurobiology.
[1] https://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/pinker.slides.html
You don't get to avoid discussion[4] about those subtitled points by retreating to some kind of invented safe space here. Out with it. Is he right?
[1] He is.
[2] He has.
[3] It is.
[4] Yeah, I'm just asserting without evidence too. But only to avoid the pointless flames that result.