We all recently revolted against the last empires and quasi-empires in favour of nationalism. It's hard to say it was unjustified, and it often came with democracy and other aspects of liberty and liberalism. But empires have played complex roles in human history. They were oppressors and enslavers, but also collectors of culture and scholarship. Enablers of travel, commerce and cultural exchange. They brought disparate cultures together, voluntarily and involuntary.
Massive empire building in many cases left culturally rich legacies. The Mongolian empire opened east-west exchange of ideas and contact between scholarly, religious and artistic culture throughout all Eurasia. Some credit it with enabling cultural movements like the Italian Renaissance. This was alongside atrocities. Look up the conquest of Baghdad.
The Baghdadi Jews the article references have a long history with empires. The community started 2700 years ago, when the King of babylon conquered Judea and shipped Jerusalem's elite to the Bagdad area. The enormous Persian empire conquered Babylon and they were at the center of a cultural superpower. Then Alexander's Greeks Came, then Romans, Parthians, Caliphs, Khans, Seljuks, Ottomans... Many Emperors. Much blood. Much art.
"We all" is an overstatement.
The book consists of paintings of events from Hebrew scripture, set in the scenery and customs of thirteenth-century France, depicted from a Christian perspective. Scenes are surrounded by text in three scripts and five languages: Latin, Persian, Arabic, Judeo-Persian, and Hebrew.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synthesis
Kindly enlighten me as to what "diverse" concepts, formulations, ideas, etc., are brought here together as a coherent form. (Poorly executed Hebrew "calligraphy"?)
This forum is likely an inappropriate venue to delve into the political and civilizational dimensions of the concerted efforts of the British academic institutions to attempt to diminish the Persian civilization and culture and its preeminence as the cultural foundation of the 'Iranian Peoples' [1], so we'll let that pass.
Delving into the misunderstandings willfully communicated by the British Library, we note the following:
1 - Sabz سبز [2][3] means Green in both Farsi and Urdu.
2 - Emeralds [4][5] have a name in both language.
3 - Nizami's Seven Beauties explicitly uses 'Color' symbolism. (And no, Green is not indicative of a mineral in that spiritual and mystic text.) [6]
4 - The curious case of degeneration of established civilizations -- High Western Civilization was the first victim -- that cynically puts forth entirely artless and amateurish "syncretic" craft [7] as equal or worthy continuation of sublime works of art. [7][8]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_peoples
[2]: https://translate.google.com/#fa/en/%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%B2
[3]: https://translate.google.com/#ur/en/%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%B2
[4]: https://translate.google.com/#en/fa/emerald
[5]: https://translate.google.com/#en/ur/emerald
[6]: https://theculturetrip.com/europe/azerbaijan/articles/the-se...
[7]: http://a6.typepad.com/6a017ee66ba427970d01b8d296ef8e970c-pi
[8]: https://mohafezekar.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/azaryun-yagh...
A Shia Muslim king gave patronage to a Jewish artist who created a syncretic work based on Hindu themes (the celestial court of Indra) in a language derived from Hindustani and a script loaned from Farsi. It provides a glimpse at a past when cultures were collaborating with each other freely to create great art work, without animosity. I wonder how many more such unique works will be re-discovered and brought to light.