Re:The R. Kelly ‘cult’ story and the ‘Gawker Effect’
by mmjaa on Monday July 31, 2017 @06:56AM
(#14890851)
One claim is as good as another. Why should those who have mass-media powers claims' be considered more valid than those who don't have these powers?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The R. Kelly ‘cult’ story and the ‘Gawker Effect’
by pvg on Monday July 31, 2017 @07:17AM
(#14890918)
One claim is as good as another.
They aren't, which is why we have things like journalism.
Re:The R. Kelly ‘cult’ story and the ‘Gawker Effect’
by mmjaa on Monday July 31, 2017 @07:31AM
(#14890977)
.. and thats why its good when those claims that are less valid are called out as such, especially from so-called 'journalistic sources' who should know better if they wish to keep their coveted spot by the throne.