News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Evolution of Trust by j2kun on Thursday July 27, 2017 @03:28PM (#14868568)
Of course, this all breaks down when you have a cartel :) I recall in one of the major prisoners dilemma tournaments, the winning entry was actually a coalition of users who would use the first few moves to establish a code for membership in the cartel, and then one entry was the master while the others were slaves. The slaves always cooperated and the master always defected, to their victory.
Re:The Evolution of Trust by s_kilk on Friday July 28, 2017 @07:09AM (#14873361)
Indeed, the major weakness of the linked piece is that it doesn't account for any kind of social structure or any class behaviour. Which, in my book, makes it fairly worthless as an analysis of actual social behaviour.
Re:The Evolution of Trust by 09094920394314 on Friday July 28, 2017 @07:28AM (#14873444)
Not worthless. This has some clear assumptions on what holds. He looks at individuals playing a certain game, with no outside information. What the parent describes is two games: 1. Prisoners dilemma between each "slave" and the "master" 2. The actual tournament
Re:The Evolution of Trust by dodorex on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:14PM (#14871157)
Interesting, do you have a link?
Re:The Evolution of Trust by alliao on Thursday July 27, 2017 @04:46PM (#14869308)
The eye!