News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

dodorex

Sounds like the Barnum effect[0]: "a common psychological phenomenon whereby individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically to them but that are, in fact, vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people"

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect

Re:San Francisco hits 106 degrees, breaking record on Saturday September 02, 2017 @01:05AM (#15154378)
Humans also didn't live in a lot of environments that were enabled by A/C.
Re:Why the Brain Needs More Downtime (2013) on Friday August 18, 2017 @01:58AM (#15043915)
"Some researchers have proposed that people are also physiologically inclined to snooze during a 2 P.M. to 4 P.M. “nap zone”—or what some might call the afternoon slump—because the brain prefers to toggle between sleep and wake more than once a day."

Anecdotally, Thomas Edison was said to sleep only 3-4 hours a night and take frequent (very frequent) naps throughout the day.

https://www.brainpickings.org/2013/02/11/thomas-edison-on-sl...

Re:The Incredible Shrinking Airline Seat on Friday August 18, 2017 @01:35AM (#15043832)
Even if you pay for specific seats you are not guaranteed those seats. http://www.farecompare.com/news/airline-seat-assignments-not...
What's with the emojis in questions? Distracting to read.
Re:The Evolution of Trust on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:14PM (#14871157)
Interesting, do you have a link?
Your logo is quite similar to Google's, enough that I was momentarily confused opening the website.
Re:Lessons scaling from 10 to 20 people on Sunday May 14, 2017 @04:40AM (#14334820)
can somebody explain why posthaven is so widespread? i don't see any reason to use it over medium etc
Re:Who lost the most marks when cheating was stopped? on Saturday May 06, 2017 @06:49PM (#14282694)
Did you read the article? Here's the relevant parts:

  The most likely culprit, it emerged, was that the "collective" and "petty" forms of corruption, as witnessed by Dr Borcan herself, had a curious effect: they might be paid for chiefly by well-off students bribing invigilators, but everyone benefited. It gave the poorer students "a free ride" to higher marks.

  It also meant that when cheating was removed, the academic advantages of wealthier students became even more apparent. Cheating it seemed had provided a kind of levelling effect.
The more correct explanation would seem to be that wealthier students have other advantages - probably along the lines of test preparation, lower stress if it's anything as in the States - which allowed them to retain high performance once cheating was reduced.

I'm not sure from where you're deriving these narratives and counter narratives from.