Re:“We will stop updating and distributing the Flash Player ...
by eridius on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @04:08AM
(#14854386)
Citation please? This is the first time I've ever heard anyone claim that flash uses less battery than html5 and I'm extremely skeptical.
Re:“We will stop updating and distributing the Flash Player ...
by m_t on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @06:44AM
(#14855079)
Just try it out, especially at the time Job wrote his piece.
Of course your MBP would spin its fan and drain battery when playing a flash game. But it would do the same, and faster, when playing the same game implemented in Javascript, even more so at the time.
Re:“We will stop updating and distributing the Flash Player ...
by eridius on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @01:17PM
(#14858140)
That's not actually evidence. I can't "just try it out", because I don't have a collection of flash games with html5 equivalents. And I still don't believe you.
Having my fans go on full blast because of Flash is something I remember happening quite often. Having my fans go on full blast because of html5 is not something I remember at all.
And your use of games here is a red herring. Nobody complained about games using up battery. The complaint was flash ads using up battery.
Jobs' proposed alternative to flash, html5, did not solve the battery hogging problem, just made it move over to html5. If anything, it made it worse because you lost the quick fix of disabling flash (or rather click-to-play). That's why even iOS devices have ad blockers now, the mobile web is horrible without them.