News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pseudo-public space in London by djmobley on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @12:30PM (#14849117)
I'm not saying London is a hellhole, but all of the issues I mentioned are commonplace, and I will see every item on that list in the course of a typical week.

I've lived in various areas, currently a bit further out in Zone 3, which means I should add rampant fly tipping and unlicensed/uninsured/abandoned cars to the list.

Eliminating these nuisances from an area is a costly business. It requires round the clock security, extensive CCTV monitoring, constant maintenance and adherence to the "broken windows" philosophy.

It is essentially a luxury, which private property owners bestow upon their 'pseudo-public' spaces. The public would be outraged if councils sought the funding, through taxes, to apply the same to truly public spaces.

Re:Pseudo-public space in London by 7952 on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @07:05PM (#14852609)
Arguably the biggest social problem to effect public space is massive amounts of car traffic. That causes orders of magnitude more problems than any of the things you mentioned. Our most important public spaces are overrun by cars that mix well with nothing.