Any citations for Snopes running "leftist propo"? I've seen that accusation leveled a few times in this thread and I'm yet to see anyone provide a concrete example.

Did you check Snopes? According to them, they are all over the map :)

http://www.snopes.com/info/notes/politics.asp

They fail to completely adhere to the right-wing Fox News counter-narrative. People caught up in that consider everything else "leftist propo."

Colbert said it best: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias".

Is that why the reality of 2016 election results was such a surprise?

Since when did politics have anything to do with reality?

> For what it's worth, a lot of people like myself consider Snopes a source of leftist propo, not truth.

That's much more a reflection of your biases than theirs.

> For what it's worth, a lot of people like myself consider Snopes a source of leftist propo, not truth.

Is this more "reality has a known liberal bias" sarcasm? Or as you saying the entire concept of objective truth is leftist propaganda?

> For what it's worth [...]

It's not worth a lot, unless backed up by fact.

There's a really big difference between leftists and liberals, actually. A larger difference than between mainstream Republicans and the tea party, I'd say.

Most leftists camouflage as liberals in everyday conversation because their views are very extreme compared to what most have encountered.

I'm not sure why that follows- if anything, in my experience pandering propaganda tends to increase profits - just look at Breitbart on the right and Huffington post on the left. It drives clicks just as well and seems to be cheaper to produce than real investigative journalism.

As TFA mentions, the authors have been cut off from the ad revenue. So it may be producing a lot, but only the hosting company is getting it, if the article is to be believed.