But that wasn't the case for the author. He was happy to have gotten fired. He thanked his manager for letting him go. Having another job, ever, was completely off the table, not an option.
This is not a rational mindset. Yours might be, you don't seem to want to share your thought process and I'm sure you have your reasons for that.
But his clearly isn't.
Says who? Are you some arbiter of rationality?
What logical argument supports that going freelance and not wanting to be a salaried employer is not a "rational mindset"?
It's a perfectly rational choice.
The lack of that observation may mean he isn't the most stellar author ever. Or it may mean he is not some font of wisdom and his explanations are sort of half-baked. But none of that is evidence that his choices were irrational.
It doesn't have to be the same choice you would make for it to be rational.
And I don't owe you justification for my life choices. It is obnoxious to imply that I do.
I haven't dismissed nor attacked your life choices. I have merely pointed out the obvious-on-the-face-of-it fact that your life is different from his and this creates different decision trees and different outcomes. That's it.
I didn't realize how much the condition was affecting me until several years after I started on my own. Now I know that it caused me to make more emotional decisions, to have a short fuse, and to tire easily. It still does.
As I reflect on it, I try not to make that too much of a factor. It's one of those mysterious impossible-to-indentify conditions. I still marvel that a person can go to an office every day, work around all of those people, and not need to take a nap in the middle of the day. In the rare days that I really feel good, suddenly "normal" people make sense. But that quickly slips away.
I don't want to make that a part of my rationalization of my decisions, though it likely played a large part. Anyway, I think I explained the rationale behind my irrationality in my post so I'll let that do the rest.
How? Not a rhetorical question; most people, even with a lucrative skill and the basics of negotiation, don't manage that. How did your friend pull it off?
If you have a lucrative skill, then you can keep doing changing jobs until you have one you like. If you don't have a lucrative skill, your first priority should be getting one. These days you can swipe a credit card to go to code school. Or just save up. Code school grads still get snapped up as soon as they graduate.
Not everybody likes to code, but hey, it's better than not having a job.
If you have a lucrative skill you'd be an idiot to go work for someone else. You can have your own business and have clients coming to YOU, and get to keep all the profit, and grow the business too.
So, somehow your definition of lucrative skill is "lucrative, but only if you're a salaried employee".
The business side is only a hassle at scale, at which case, you can afford to hire some assistants.
What I would do in your position would be to be very clear in a job interview what health conditions you have that must be accommodated for. Once you start the job, find a routine that works. And then don't let anyone pressure you into deviating from your routine. They need to accommodate you, not the other way around.
Eventually it'll get fixed into the company firmament and you'll have your security.