SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster

Re:SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster by scrooched_moose on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @01:05PM (#14745865)

I'm a daily user of some of the most complicated engineering software on the market. Every single release promises "Easier to use!" but all they do is make the most basic beginner-level actions more prominent and hide all medium to advanced level important functionality behind 3 extra clicks.

The end result is a beginner can do a tutorial exercise in 20 minutes instead of 30, while any true day to day work in the software takes 4 hours instead of 2.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster by mysterydip on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @02:44PM (#14746841)

From the company's perspective, getting more beginner users on the software (and converting them to regularly paying users) is probably the priority.

That doesn't mean they couldn't put an "advanced mode" setting/option that makes the UI streamlined towards users like yourself, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster by claytonjy on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @05:08PM (#14748088)

Do you think this tradeoff between easy-to-start-using and power-use-friendly is intrinsic, a scale that designers need to choose where they want their software in it, or is it possible to hit both ends? Does anyone have examples of things they think address both beginners and power users adequately?

[ Parent | on HN ]