Re:Why Quora uses MySQL rather than No-SQL
by brown9-2 on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @08:23AM
(#1474598)
Also interesting is citing Facebooks giant usage of MySQL (1800 servers, 2 DBAs) but ignoring that they advocate pretty strongly for schemaless structures.
Re:Why Quora uses MySQL rather than No-SQL
by dangelo on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @01:51PM
(#1475591)
The built-in MySQL schemas have problems - mostly that schema changes can take hours or days on large tables. As a result of this you need to build a system that doesn't require schema changes at the MySQL level. This doesn't mean you can't use schemas at a higher level though.
There are two ways to build on top of MySQL - you can either make a flexible schemaless structure with objects and properties and associations between them, which is what Facebook advocates for, or you can make a flexible virtual schema that has column names, types, and arbitrary indexes. I'm in favor of the latter.
Re:Why Quora uses MySQL rather than No-SQL
by aaronblohowiak on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @04:39AM
(#1474253)
ACID
BASE
Re:Why Quora uses MySQL rather than No-SQL
by jbellis on Wednesday June 30, 2010 @10:40AM
(#1474936)
I'm guessing downmodders aren't aware of this article? http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1394128
So, schemaless vs. schemaful is similar to static typed vs. dynamic typed? (or is it more like typed vs. untyped?)
> I think the "NoSQL" fad will end when someone finally implements a distributed relational database with relaxed semantics.
What does he mean by "relaxed semantics"?