Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by Spooky23 on Saturday July 08, 2017 @09:03PM
(#14727908)
Apple has more market power than you think -- they focus on a few models, those models sell like hot cakes and Apple pays for guarantees to get inventory. For Intel that means their factories keep pumping out chips like clockwork and inventory is low.
Dell or HP sells more units, but in 300 or more SKUs each. Apple is different enough to get better terms.
Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by myrandomcomment on Sunday July 09, 2017 @12:20AM
(#14728348)
This. Intel does not make money from the CPU in the broader sense, they make money by running their production lines at full tilt and getting paid for what comes off them.
Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by vesh on Saturday July 08, 2017 @08:27PM
(#14727821)
You didn't get better pricing you did get marketing money.
Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by Retric on Saturday July 08, 2017 @08:49PM
(#14727869)
Money is fungible, so de facto you got a lower price.
Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by mewse on Saturday July 08, 2017 @08:57PM
(#14727893)
Money is fungible, so de facto I got a lower price on my house by eating cheap ramen noodles for lunch.
Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by LukeShu on Saturday July 08, 2017 @10:46PM
(#14728117)
Ability to get stickers is contingent on actually buying the CPU first. Buying ramen isn't contingent on first buying a house.
The post you replied to is saying "A rebate is de facto a discount."
Re:Steve Jobs and the Missing “Intel Inside” Sticker
by asdfgadsfgasfdg on Sunday July 09, 2017 @02:37AM
(#14728658)
Did you buy a batch load of ramen from the same supplier as your house?
Or perhaps there was enough incentive for Intel to get rid of the last remaining PowerPC platform in end-user computing. Certainly in volume alone Apple doesn't represent a very significant supplier of Intel-based computers.