Other things, not so much.
And speaking of "democracy" is a two party system really all that much better or different than a one party system?
But, yes, even a two party democracy is better than a one party authoritarian regime.
The current government is IMHO doing a great job. Even on issues that they aren't great on, they are at least trending in the right direction. Why meddle and fix something that isn't broken?
Is that what your unhelpful 'lol' implies?
I really like the Chinese people, but... their gov. is f*king evil mess against them
To be fair, the current Chinese administration (Xi Jinping) identified back in 2012 corruption as one of the greatest threats to the Communist party (rightly so for any government imho) and began an unprecedented campaign to crack down on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-corruption_campaign_under...
Right now they are having a hard enough time trying to control their citizens. They won't be a superpower until they topple a few democratically elected governments first.
I am really waiting for a NY Times article that has some angle about what China can teach us, not what they should learn from us.
For the last 30 years we have been getting continuous dispatches that Communism with Chinese characteristics will fail into economic collapse, that it's an enormous bubble, that the economy can't grow without democracy, that Hong Kong needs to be a model of democracy for the rest of China, etc. This mainly comes out of the "official narrative" mouth pieces known as the New York Times and the Washington Post. Whenever I see nytimes.com in the sourcee I'm always thinking, ok what's the new angle that everyone's supposed to believe now? It would be better if they just gave the byline to someone at the State Department or the CIA.