News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by drcross on Thursday June 29, 2017 @11:10AM (#14663905)
It's a bit like the people raving that the sky will fall when cars are all internet connected because they will vulnerable to hacking but completely ignoring that you could cause far more damage with a pallet of bricks being thrown off a motorway bridge, which generally doesn't ever happen.
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by GavinMcG on Thursday June 29, 2017 @11:17AM (#14663948)
To be fair, throwing a pallet of bricks off a bridge wouldn't cause as much damage as causing 1% of an area's cars to crash, and it's a crime you actually have to be on site for.

People are quite reasonably more afraid of attack vectors that can affect huge numbers of people all at once, especially when the attacker could be anywhere in the world.

One obvious example of why that's reasonable is the recent ransomware – sure, you've always been able to easily extort $300 from someone, but now you can take money from a lot of people, and not get caught.

Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by digi_owl on Thursday June 29, 2017 @12:01PM (#14664312)
Hacking, witchcraft, radioactivity. They all have in common that they are something you can't see, hear, or smell coming at you. Thus they are anxiety inducing...
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by fao_ on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:58PM (#14665420)
Radioactivity is probable, but not likely. Locally we were advised not to eat sheep for about a decade because of ~an incident~ to do with radioactive material.

Hacking is something that is getting more and more likely by the day. First, WannaCry infects the world over and knocks out a hospital system. What's next? Pacemakers going offline? Insulin pumps being hacked? Hell, cars can already be hacked from a distance, internet connected cars aren't raising a risk factor by much, aside from it lengthening the distance at which you can do the hack.

Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by mannykannot on Thursday June 29, 2017 @12:41PM (#14664660)
In two of those cases, some level of anxiety is justifiable.
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by optimuspaul on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:34PM (#14665159)
Witchcraft and Radioactivity right?
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by marcosdumay on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:08PM (#14665506)
Well, probably. Unless you are stupid enough to plug your car to the internet.
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by ceejayoz on Thursday June 29, 2017 @12:14PM (#14664428)
I suspect if you could throw bricks off bridges remotely from Russia with a few keystrokes it'd be more common.
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by jfrankamp on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:07PM (#14665499)
I'd take a pallet of bricks any day over the aftermath of a signing key and OTA package update compromise. I'm not worried about one car getting hacked, that's thinking too small.
Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by dsfyu404ed on Thursday June 29, 2017 @12:11PM (#14664394)
Do you remember that time a certain governor got in hot water for instructing that a "traffic study" which involved closing lanes be conducted on a particularly congested bridge.

Now imagine that on every bridge. It only takes one car to bottle up a lane.

Re:Researchers Found They Could Hack Wind Farms by KGIII on Thursday June 29, 2017 @02:40PM (#14665796)
Interesting that you mention that. I modeled traffic. Give me a two way radio, a dozen cars, and time to monitor the traffic and I can probably bring most any large urban area's traffic throughput to a crawl.