I have to reply to your comment, since I don't find his comment to be political at all, more pointing to the semantical point of things being illegal.
Second, I've browsed through the comments and their submitters comments. I find it striking some people's accounts have been banned on the basis of very few comments.
Lastly, the political debate is often the thing I find interesting about the comment threads on HN, Its getting to see the different viewpoints which interests me. Ofcourse we have to be civil and respectful towards each other, but when we are, I don't see any problem on any topic, how can any topic be destructive to the intended use of the site?
Re:Bill Gurley Is Leaving Uber’s Board
by mattmanser on Thursday June 22, 2017 @07:50AM
(#14611548)
I also have no idea what was wrong with that comment. I wonder if dang replied to the wrong commentator?
I also find it crazy they do this in the threads and not by email, very easy to miss if you don't religiously check your /threads. I got a warning from dang once and he claimed I'd been warned before, which from my perspective I'd never been warned. They have my email.
The key test is 'primarily'. Commenting occasionally on political topics, among others, is fine. But using the site primarily for political battle is not fine, regardless of which politics you favor. It's destructive of the intended use of the site, which is the gratification of intellectual curiosity. Since we can't have both kinds of site, we have to be careful about this.
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&prefix&page=0&dateRange=...