News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by legitster on Monday June 19, 2017 @01:00PM (#14588438)
The Washington Redskins had already filed an Amicus brief in support of this change.

It seems weird to me that this became a free speech issue; I had always assumed trademarks were not a form of speech, just business protection (similar to a patent).

Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by antognini on Monday June 19, 2017 @01:16PM (#14588578)
The name of your business is indisputably considered speech. By providing trademarks to some business names and not others, the government is providing substantial commercial rewards to certain kinds of speech over others. It might still be a kind of business protection, but the issue is that they must provide that protection without regard to the speech of the applicants.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by ajross on Monday June 19, 2017 @03:02PM (#14589465)
To be clear: very few people involved in the Redskins naming controversy think they should be prevented from using the name as a matter of law. It's not inconsistent to believe they have a first amendment right to name the team what they want but also that the name is offensive and should be changed (or even that the NFL is within its right to force such a change).
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by bmelton on Monday June 19, 2017 @03:21PM (#14589609)
Very few "members of the public", maybe, but that doesn't really matter for much when the Patent & Trademark Office is attempting to strip them of their patent protection because they consider it a slur.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Redskins_trademark_...

That was compounded SCOTUS' rejection of the Redskins appeal, though this opinion should basically resolve the Redskins dispute anyway.

Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by mlinksva on Monday June 19, 2017 @01:11PM (#14588542)
Trademarks are a form of censorship.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by unsayable on Monday June 19, 2017 @01:27PM (#14588655)
South Park had Cartman use the un-trademarkable version of the Redskins to achieve his personal business goals in an excellent season of South Park: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnK-jYzaWtw
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by jhanschoo on Monday June 19, 2017 @09:44PM (#14591664)
That's quite a claim you just made. By the same reasoning, would you consider copyright censorship as well?
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by bitJericho on Monday June 19, 2017 @01:31PM (#14588698)
I have no doubt the Redskins could keep their name if they were actually comprised of Native Americans that wanted to call themselves that.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by bmelton on Monday June 19, 2017 @03:22PM (#14589617)
Well, as this decision effectively strikes down the provision that the PTO was using to deny the Redskins trademark protection, they effectively just won the right regardless.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by votepaunchy on Monday June 19, 2017 @01:48PM (#14588841)
Then no more Dallas "Cowboys" either.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by bitJericho on Monday June 19, 2017 @08:29PM (#14591410)
Cowboys and Giants aren't a race. Celtics is not a racial slur.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by Banthum on Monday June 19, 2017 @02:05PM (#14588982)
And let's not even get into the Boston "Celtics"...
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by dsfyu404ed on Monday June 19, 2017 @03:47PM (#14589841)
Yeah, the police union will take that one and keep it for themselves faster then you can say donuts in the break room.
Re:The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name by koolba on Monday June 19, 2017 @02:49PM (#14589365)
And clearly the Giants are the size of mere mortals.