News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channels, 128 PCIe lanes. Parent comment

Re:AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channe... by nodesocket on Friday June 16, 2017 @03:49AM (#14567292)
In fact I am not an oblivious "kid fresh out of highschool"... Also, I think you are confusing performance with business success and sales. AMD may have had better performing CPUs in the past, but that has not mattered thus far. $INTC market cap 165 billion. $AMD market cap 10 billion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channe... by redtuesday on Friday June 16, 2017 @05:18AM (#14567593)
Then you are probably aware that it has not mattered because of Intels shady tactics. [0][1][2][3] etc.

[0] https://www.wired.com/2009/12/ftc-sues-intel-for-anti-compet...

[1] http://www.silicon.co.uk/workspace/dell-pays-65million-to-se...

[2] http://techreport.com/news/8547/does-intel-compiler-cripple-...

[3] http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49#49

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channe... by geezerjay on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:55AM (#14567900)
> Also, I think you are confusing performance with business success and sales.

I see your point. I've misinterpreted your comment assuming it was focused on performance instead of market share.

[ Parent | on HN ]