Re:AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channe...
by nodesocket on Friday June 16, 2017 @03:49AM
(#14567292)
In fact I am not an oblivious "kid fresh out of highschool"... Also, I think you are confusing performance with business success and sales. AMD may have had better performing CPUs in the past, but that has not mattered thus far. $INTC market cap 165 billion. $AMD market cap 10 billion.
Re:AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channe...
by redtuesday on Friday June 16, 2017 @05:18AM
(#14567593)
Then you are probably aware that it has not mattered because of Intels shady tactics. [0][1][2][3] etc.
[0] https://www.wired.com/2009/12/ftc-sues-intel-for-anti-compet...
[1] http://www.silicon.co.uk/workspace/dell-pays-65million-to-se...
[2] http://techreport.com/news/8547/does-intel-compiler-cripple-...
Re:AMD EPYC 7000 CPUs: 32 cores, 64 threads, 8 memory channe...
by geezerjay on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:55AM
(#14567900)
> Also, I think you are confusing performance with business success and sales.
I see your point. I've misinterpreted your comment assuming it was focused on performance instead of market share.
I don't know where you got that perception. Perhaps you're a kid fresh out of highschool and are oblivious to AMD's history, but AMD's Athlon line outperformed Intel's offering of the time by a wide margin, namely their Pentium II, Pentium III, Pentium IV and Pentium D lines.
IIRC, Intel only started to become competitive with AMD with the introduction of their Core 2 line.